|
After this post, I'm done with the conversation, this is getting way too much about the two of us and not enough about the comic to obey the moderator's warning and I don't feel like getting banned.
Lol and here i was afraid i was starting to sound like an sjw.
Me telling you you're wrong is not bullying.
You're not just telling me that I'm wrong. You're using a harsh tone, and just basically implied that I'm the SJW as a pejorative.
There is no implication that he assumed the boyfriend's identity, just that he is a fucking idiot that didn't reveal his.
Which means that he mistakenly believed in there being consent and his intentions were not to do harm. To then be made blackout drunk, and be raped through her plotting, is undeserved.
If you want to try to take that implication to false conclusions then don't cry when you get called out on it.
You implied he was aware he was being sneaky. You even used that kind of phrasing. (Sneaking into bed)
Don't put your poor phrasing and communication mistake on me.
The actual conclusion, as i have stated already, is that he's a fucking moron who thought being a third wheel once meant that he was in a long term/recurring sexual relationship with her where she was dtf whenever, wherever, however.
Which doesn't make him bad, it makes in mistaken about the nature of their triangle.
This led him to believe that normal social protocols did not matter and that she was cool to fuck him so he didn't think that he should say, "hey it's bob, wanna fuck?"
Now this is a stretch. Normal social protocols for many who are in a DTF situation include "Free-use" touching, where the understanding is that if someone is not in the mood, they were reject the touching. He even established this with a hand on her waist. She responded positively. Now, you can claim "Hey baby" is boyfriend only talk, and not sexy talk, but then you've never been in a deep south area where even your waitress calls you baby. Don't apply your social norms and perspectives to everyone else.
Which leads us right back to my original fucking point that this line of logic, unlike what the guy said who i originally replied to, is not reasonable.
Tending to think you're confusing posters.
Regardless, this wasn't rape. This would be sexual assault outside of a college campus, the same way there's a difference between homicide and manslaughter in the legal system.
|
