>>2612124
No. They're not going to reply, because people like you made the environment inhospitable and inconducive for constructive, civil discourse.
Think about it.
If anyone, out of those who had participated in this thread, were to be banned, you would be amongst the first.
>>2610585
> very cool op. You are literally acting like a purplebirdman comic character. Which is why the comics are good. Like real life there are interesting, good, ambiguous etc people, and then there are just annoying confused individuals like you. Very realistic.
Yep. I did write novels in OP's thread. And I'll write more novels if I so choose, unless OP himself tells me to knock it off. Regardless, in none of my initial novels did I ever make any personal attacks against any of you. I did not directly address any of you with inflammatory intent. I addressed you, retaliatorily, only once you resorted to directing negativity to me.
You're always free to disagree with me about the sentiments I made regarding mental illness glamorizing, personality disorder glamorizing, internalized homophobia celebrating, the conscientious and intentional feminizing (neutering) of non-toxic masc/cis men, etc.
But if I may use some other analogies, here?
Would you disagree that a person should always thoroughly clean himself, with soap and water, whenever possible, before he proceeds to have sex with another person? (Especially if he /demands/ this sex, like he is owed it.)
Would you disagree that it's wrong for a person to knowingly transmit his STIs to another, random person?
Would you disagree that it's wrong for a billionaire to intentionally exploit an obviously impoverished person to extract more gains from that poor bastard, in the pursuit of their further profit?
Would you disagree, in general, that it is the better to act with decorum and discipline, than with anarchy and disrespect?
Would you disagree that humans require air, water, protein, and blood, so they don't die?
Yep. I did write novels in OP's thread. You know what other participants did when they didn't feel like engaging with all that? They left it alone. They left /me/ alone. They remained respectful. They expressed their own opinions without singling me out, and they moved the fuck on. In spite of my writing novels in this thread, some participants also chose to engage with a couple of my points, once or twice, with genuine intellectual curiosity, and with good faith.
In any event, nothing I wrote (in the beginning) had discouraged folks from chiming in. Even with the presence of my oh-so-oppressive long-winded screeds other folks felt just fine participating in the conversation to voice their views, without impediment.
On what grounds, exactly, would a moderator have to ban those who weren't being hostile and provocative, like you were, for no justifiable reason? /I/ am still here, talking quite freely, and that's in spite of my returning fire to you and almost everyone else who thought it was a good idea to poke the hornet's nest. /You/ are still here, talking quite freely, and that's in spite of your behaving crudely, and in spite of your insinuating you had a parting gift for me that included a banned term.
Mind you, once again, at no point did I ever run into a "you can't say that here!" prohibition when submitting my posts to this thread.
By the way, I do remain very interested in knowing what you were dying to say to me. But, don't say it to me here, in OP's thread. This is not the space for it. I'm /way/ over you guys derailing and distracting from what I consider to be a very important topic for people to have discourse on.
> Current topic: Does PBM propagate problematic and potentially harmful male character stereotypes, for example through his depiction of the character "Ricky Iglesias" in his ongoing comic "The Dropouts"?
Make your own thread in /d. Title it "Let us discuss how much of an awful mouthbreathing idjit Yammy is shall we?" or something like that. Anyone can participate. Be it regular user, or moderator, or site administrator.
Of course, it does stand to reason, if I were truly such a bad person, I would have been permabanned by now.
If the likes of /you/
>>2611203
> It's pretty obvious that you're the op. Like most users on reddit, 4ch, u18, 8ch.moe etc, you samefag your own topic that you created. It's not that bad. That's pretty standard run-of-the-mill forever online mental illness.
can stay here, I don't see why I should be summarily ejected (for standing up to your bullying).
Edited at 2026/10/13 19:40:22
|
