Advertisement
Advertisement
/c/ - Furry Comics
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Media ID
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: 1509409251.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage01final_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1509409251.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage01final.png) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:35 No.1399555   
Add Tag
This exists
Expand All Images
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:36 No.1399556
Add Tag
File: 1510189797.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage02_u18chan.png - (1.42mb, 920x1280, 1510189797.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage02.png)
>>1399555
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:38 No.1399557
Add Tag
File: 1511221705.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage03_u18chan.png - (1.46mb, 920x1280, 1511221705.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage03.png)
>>1399555
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:39 No.1399558
Add Tag
File: 1512039947.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage04_u18chan.png - (1.24mb, 920x1280, 1512039947.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage04.png)
>>1399555
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:41 No.1399559
Add Tag
File: 1512712632.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage05_u18chan.png - (1.09mb, 920x1280, 1512712632.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage05.png)
>>1399555
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:43 No.1399560
Add Tag
File: 1515978541.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage06finished_u18chan.png - (1.1mb, 920x1280, 1515978541.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage06finished.png)
>>1399555
>>
Repressed Urges UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/01 15:27:44 No.1399561
Add Tag
File: 1518168008.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgesnewpage7_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1518168008.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgesnewpage7.png)
>>1399555
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/01 16:26:31 No.1399584
Add Tag
a bit ruff (ba-dum-tss) but so far it isnt so bad
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/04 10:10:40 No.1400915
Add Tag
o.o;

Do they normally put women and men into the same rooms at college? Or is that just a convenient plot device? ...and you'd think if the two of them were both this energetic, and living in the same room, they wouldn't both BE this hard up.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/04 17:24:24 No.1401050
Add Tag
>>1400915
I dont think its a dorm at all because the woman is his mom lol
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/04 19:02:25 No.1401071
Add Tag
It's his mom, he lives at home he just came home from school
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/04 19:07:38 No.1401072
Add Tag
File: 1519896851.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage09-recovered_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1519896851.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage09-recovered.png)
New page. Comic is bisexual
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/05 17:01:43 No.1401648
Add Tag
It's really weird when artists draw all their characters to look biologically female and then just give them genitals to indicate what their sex actually is...
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/06 03:25:43 No.1401974
Add Tag
Meh, feminine guys exist and birds of a feather tend to flock together. Main char is in a gay relationship according to the last page so it makes sense that they at least are.

Will be nice to see if more variety is introduced, but i personally dont mind all that much considering the main part of this comic is focused on the mother anyways
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/06 04:06:17 No.1401984
Add Tag
>>1399560
"Before I make a big mess"... goes in his room and yizz all over the floor. Genius!
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/06 15:48:17 No.1402753
Add Tag
wired controller? what year is it?
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/07 06:38:40 No.1403004
Add Tag
>>1402753
Since that's a GameCube controller, I'm going with early 2000s.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/08 03:48:07 No.1403494
Add Tag
Or they gonna smash

Edited at 2018/03/08 03:48:44
>>
UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/09 15:50:50 No.1404201
Add Tag
It's not the first comic of the two.
There was one maybe a year or two back called Released Inhibitions
>>
Furrynomous 2018/03/09 16:22:54 No.1404212
Add Tag
>>1404201
I believe i remember him saying this was a prequel and that hes redoing that one
>>
UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/03/21 11:08:18 No.1409368
Add Tag
File: 641dfc01-3348-4840-b86b-e76393942c63_u18chan.png - (1.32mb, 920x1280, 641dfc01-3348-4840-b86b-e76393942c63.png)

>>
Page 10 Furrynomous 2018/05/05 02:46:07 No.1430941
Add Tag
File: tumblr_p71pfurX4n1scq6veo10_4001_u18chan.png - (273.19kb, 400x556, tumblr_p71pfurX4n1scq6veo10_400 (1).png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/05/21 06:59:28 No.1439036
Add Tag
File: 1526639724.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage11_u18chan.png - (1.3mb, 920x1280, 1526639724.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage11.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/05/21 15:19:15 No.1439175
Add Tag
Intersex if I ever saw it, if not plain gay. Not trying to be an ass but pretty sure this is in the wrong area.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/05/21 15:58:46 No.1439184
Add Tag
>>1439036

I'm bi so the gayness doesnt bother me but damn it, why do a "<3" for a heart with spoken dialogue in a comic? Just draw the damn heart or leave it out.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/05/21 16:52:46 No.1439211
Add Tag
This indeed exists. And is indeed a cringefest. Holy shit.
>>
G-Birkin # MOD # 2018/05/21 17:09:00 No.1439228
Add Tag
>>1439175

Our concept of if a bi comic goes in /c or /gc is based on the straight/gay ratio of it. Until now most of it is straight, so it'll continue here until the pages with gay content exceeds the ones with straight or lesbian content.
>>
UNeverKnowWhoUrTalking2 2018/06/08 15:28:40 No.1448639
Add Tag
File: 1528433183.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage12_u18chan.png - (905.46kb, 920x1280, 1528433183.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage12.png)
Because any straight sex scene is hidden in /gc
>>
Furrynomous 2018/08/09 05:28:54 No.1477661
Add Tag
File: 1531650669.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage13final_u18chan.png - (1000kb, 920x1280, 1531650669.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage13final.png)
There the gay pages are over, all 3 of em
>>
Furrynomous 2018/08/09 05:30:18 No.1477662
Add Tag
File: 1531650783.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage14final_u18chan.png - (776.12kb, 920x1280, 1531650783.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage14final.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/08/09 05:31:19 No.1477663
Add Tag
File: 1533610694.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage15_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1533610694.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage15.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/08/09 12:55:21 No.1477728
Add Tag
Thanks for posting, this comic is cute so far!
>>
Furrynomous 2018/08/24 16:15:57 No.1485104
Add Tag
File: 1534836208.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage16_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1534836208.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage16.png)

>>
the tauren 2018/08/25 13:26:35 No.1485391
Add Tag
son use borner attack it really efficent

congratulations your catch your mom.

:3
>>
Furrynomous 2018/09/18 23:20:11 No.1495758
Add Tag
File: 1536833231.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage17_u18chan.png - (1.17mb, 920x1280, 1536833231.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage17.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/09/18 23:21:37 No.1495762
Add Tag
File: 1536833520.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage18_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, 1536833520.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage18.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/09/25 20:29:23 No.1498410
Add Tag
Is weird but cute at the same time lol
>>
Furrynomous 2018/09/26 18:17:50 No.1498733
Add Tag
Any updates
>>
Furrynomous 2018/10/01 00:24:40 No.1500293
Add Tag
HEY SON, DO YOU THINK I'M SEXY??? COMPLETELY HYPOTHETICALLY OF COURSE NOT IN A WEIRD WAY HA HA HA
>>
Furrynomous 2018/10/01 18:01:38 No.1500586
Add Tag
Yah the dialogue in this is a little awkward but it's still very cute, thanks for posting
>>
Furrynomous 2018/10/06 08:55:51 No.1502254
Add Tag
Can't wait for more pages
>>
Furrynomous 2018/11/11 14:39:08 No.1516300
Add Tag
File: ru19_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, ru19.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/11/11 14:39:57 No.1516301
Add Tag
File: ru20_u18chan.png - (3.37mb, 920x1280, ru20.png)

>>
the tauren 2018/11/11 17:07:19 No.1516335
Add Tag
tease tease tease.

impressive this young pup resist to the tentation.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/11/29 06:25:39 No.1522562
Add Tag
File: 2510575_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage21_u18chan.png - (1.12mb, 920x1280, 2510575_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage21.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/21 05:41:11 No.1529914
Add Tag
File: 1545390117.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage222_u18chan.png - (1.24mb, 920x1280, 1545390117.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage222.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/10 23:52:06 No.1537596
Add Tag
File: 2564036_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage23_u18chan.png - (1.29mb, 920x1280, 2564036_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage23.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/10 23:52:27 No.1537597
Add Tag
File: 2564043_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage24_u18chan.png - (1.19mb, 920x1280, 2564043_Woofypaws_repressedurgespage24.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/15 17:25:47 No.1539574
Add Tag
This keeps getting better and better.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/17 02:25:48 No.1540268
Add Tag
>>1539574
Yeah, I like it a lot. Just a shame the artist has been putting out new pages so slowly.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/17 21:07:54 No.1540504
Add Tag
>>1540268

Well would you want quality? or quantity?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/17 22:41:17 No.1540533
Add Tag
>>1540504
Not to mention is not behind a paywall
>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/19 07:24:07 No.1540898
Add Tag
>>1540533
oh yes how dare an artist want to be payed so that they can earn a living.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/01/19 23:24:50 No.1541188
Add Tag
>>1540898

The artist wanting something for their work I don't believe is the problem in a lot cases. The issue is most everything anymore has a price tag to go with it. People get tired of laying down money for everything, myself included.

Want to get a bite to eat? Pay up for that burger you just ordered, and the gas you need to drive there and back.

Go bowling, to the club/bar, etc? More money. Rent a movie? Rental or netflix, somebody's paying for it. Pirate the movie instead? You're still paying for power and internet to be able to do that.

Get some snacks and stay in for the night? Guess what! Gas money and snack money.

Everything costs money. In fact there's only two things I can do for fun right now that don't cost me *anything*. Jerking off and going out to get some exercise. I suppose though anymore only the latter is valid, considering most seem to prefer to spank one out to *something*, which is going to cost something one way or the other, unless you happen to have a magazine or something else printed that doesn't consume any power to run.


TL:DR. Money. People are tired of spending it.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 06:37:45 No.1546341
Add Tag
File: 1548758084.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage25-recovered_u18chan.png - (1.22mb, 920x1280, 1548758084.woofyrainshadow_repressedurgespage25-recovered.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 08:22:14 No.1546361
Add Tag
>>1541188

So you're saying that even thought the same thing applies to the artist, they shouldn't expect any form of gain from work they've done?

Your entire argument is "I can't afford stuff, so people should stop asking for money for their products"
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 08:25:09 No.1546362
Add Tag
Despite the fact this artist went to a paid method for this comic, at least I can't cringe harder at the comic now since the pages must be paid for.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 09:58:56 No.1546403
Add Tag
>>1546362

Where did he say that?


>>1546361

The strawman is strong with this one. That or your reading comprehension is complete shit. Maybe both. I'm starting to wonder if you only read the tl;dr and inferred what the rest said.

>Your entire argument is "I can't afford stuff, so people should stop asking for money for their products"

No. No, go back and read it again. The problem I highlighted is that people are tired of spending money, more often than not because there's only so much to go around. So after making the car payment, electric bill, water bill, gas bill, heating/cooling bill, groceries, fuel, taxes on all of the above; you aren't left with much, if any, disposable income left to spend on art (read: porn). So, what's going to happen (more often than not), is some person is going to run across something they like only to find the rest of it or perhaps the entire thing is behind a paywall, in which case they'll think "Oh great, something/someone else that wants money.". That goes straight back to "Money. People are tired of spending it.".

Everybody's time is worth something, which is why nearly every last thing on this god forsaken planet has a price tag associated with it. I personally have no issue with an artist asking for a little bit of dough if you enjoy their work. Good on them for realizing that their hobby can earn them some extra spending cash and acting on it. That same artist, though, shouldn't be surprised if they don't get many bites.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 10:35:21 No.1546410
Add Tag
>>1546403

This right here is the problem with piracy as a fundamental whole summed up. Yes, in an ideal world, all consumption would be paid for because there is the funds to pay for it to begin with. The unfortunate reality is that there are real world priorities that must be addressed. The material bills are a big one. For those who have disposable income to such a degree that they pirate for the sake of? I have little to say in defense. For people like me, like many I talk to? We pirate because we look for what is worth spending money on. The alternative is we do nothing, which I can argue to be a case of the haves vs the have nots.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 11:53:17 No.1546434
Add Tag
>>1546410

Finally, somebody understands and agrees.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/01 16:50:30 No.1546495
Add Tag
>>1540533
>>1540898
>>1541188

^^^

>>1546403
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/02 04:18:12 No.1546669
Add Tag
>>1546410
>Yes, in an ideal world, all consumption would be paid for

The question is, consumption of what? If you copy a digital file, you haven't consumed any more of the author's time or effort. Why should they get paid -again-?

That's the problem with paywalls, and copyrights in the general sense. It's fundamentally nothing to do with people having to spread their money far and wide - it's about the rights holders trying to make you pay for something that is literally not their business. Money is being demanded over something that actually doesn't demand to be paid.

The whole business is based on collective fiction, a sort of hypnosis where people simply believe that a video game is really worth $60, or that the right to view someone's paywalled gallery is really worth $5 a month, etc. but when you ask why, nobody can come up with a reason. It's just "The author deserves to be paid!" Yes, but not infinitely/indefinitely, and this is the wrong way to do it.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/02 08:34:43 No.1546726
Add Tag
>>1546495

Where did the *artist* say that?


>>1546669

You are aware that, with your video game example, hundreds (maybe thousands) of man hours are put into the development of said game, right? Somebody has to sit down and create every single model and asset that is in a game, from the textures to the sounds and everywhere in between. GTA:V's budget was roughly 265 million US dollars. So, considering what it takes to make a video game, I pay the price with only a slight twinge.

As for a lone artist, I believe if an artist chooses to paywall their stuff, they're within they're right to do so. I see, and somewhat agree, with your point; however I'd make the argument that not anybody can draw *well*. Anybody can draw, but not everyone can make it look good. Also consider that the equipment they use, such as an electronic drawing pad with photo-shop or other high-end software isn't cheap. They may be charging a fee upfront to help offset the cost of said equipment. I don't necessarily have a problem with that. That being said, I'm a cheap SOB so I'll go elsewhere or try to find it here for free.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/02 10:49:47 No.1546779
Add Tag
>>1546669

What this guy said --v

>>1546726

It even applies to material goods. You have a physical good valued at $60, the cost to create said item is actually $20. Their is a $30 markup for the overhead cost of factory maintenance not to mention the R&D that goes into it. If an artist makes a piece of art and puts a price of $20 on it, then the price is $20 for the right to view it/acquire it. The way you have made it generally sound is that the artist should give it up for $20 and only $20. By that metric, the artist should then lock it and wait for a massive lump sum payout of $20,000, for instance. That is not how this all works, nor can it. I question if you are fumbling the concept of copyright with "theft". At least with theft you would be correct. The art was merely copied, the original is not affected, for the artist still has it.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 06:08:32 No.1547204
Add Tag
>>1546726
>You are aware that, with your video game example, hundreds (maybe thousands) of man hours are put into the development of said game, right?

Yes, and that doesn't take away from the argument. The $60 price tag is still completely arbitrary, and in no way guarantees that these people are getting paid (they are already paid).

Plus, most of the cost of modern video game development is paying royalties and licenses for different sorts of IP, which is again based on the same paid-after-getting-paid business model.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 06:21:30 No.1547206
Add Tag
>>1546779
>If an artist makes a piece of art and puts a price of $20 on it, then the price is $20 for the right to view it/acquire it.
You're playing it as if there's no room to haggle - that we should just accept the price as given. That's not how the free market works.

>The way you have made it generally sound is that the artist should give it up for $20 and only $20. By that metric, the artist should then lock it and wait for a massive lump sum payout of $20,000, for instance. That is not how this all works, nor can it.

Yes it can, and again, you're making it sound like the $20,000 is some god-given right, an "objective value" of the art that you are entitled to get simply for having bothered to apply pen on paper.

The value of art is the cost to make it, which means the price you or anyone else is willing to make it for. This value is then subjected to market demand: the valuation by other people. If you want to be paid $20,000 then you better put out something that (a group of) people would actually pay $20,000 for. That is in essence how Patreon was originally meant to work, but then they caved in and let people erect paywalls and begging accounts.

The idea of the copyright business model is to hide the "original" price. In fact, you are not even demanding a particular sum, you are demanding "as much as possible". Individually, your customers aren't even aware of how much you are being compensated, so they have no way of evaluating whether the money they are paying is in any way proportional to the value of your work. This creates a situation where collectively people end up paying you too much (or not enough, but that's the gamble you take).

It is rare that the work is justly and reasonably compensated for, and this inflates the prices across the whole content producing and media industry. With rights and royalties, and plenty of loose undeserved money to go around, everyone's overcharging everyone and the final customer (you) ends up screwed the most. Point is case: Hollywood is bigger in terms of GDP than the entire agricultural sector of the US. The society is literally paying more for shitty movies than we are for food.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 06:52:54 No.1547236
Add Tag
>>1546726
> GTA:V's budget was roughly 265 million US dollars.

The 256 million dollars is the budget of the game + online + expansion DLC (SP DLC, a la GTA4 LaD/BoGT) + MP DLC. Plus, a huge chunk of the budget is marketing, so what you're saying is, you're happy to pay them to advertise the game to you.

Game development budgets have ballooned for the same reason as Hollywood movie costs - IP holders can charge crazy money because there's no competition. They're monopolies by law. If you don't pay, you don't get to use the game physics engine, or the likeness of a car model, and the agent of the famous voice actor is now demanding $10 million plus 5% of the profits. In the end, it doesn't matter how much it really cost to develop or make, all that matters is it's Copyright, Trademark, Patented and oh we also sent the mafia after you.

If the estimated consumer base is 10 million, and the estimated selling price (based on previous sales) is $60, then the expected payoff is $600 million. With a risk estimate of 50% you discount that to $300 million, and when everyone involved makes the same calculation, they jack their prices up to the point that the game will cost somewhere around $300 million. This then turns up as justification for the consumers: "Look, this is how much it costs to make.", and the people start to believe it's really worth it, when in reality the price you are paying just depends on the price you were paying before, plus a little bit more if possible. Rinse and reapeat.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 07:36:50 No.1547256
Add Tag
>>1546726
>however I'd make the argument that not anybody can draw *well*. Anybody can draw, but not everyone can make it look good.

Then you can't demand as much money for it. If it's not enough, then you either get better, or do something else that's more aligned with your skills. There's no sense in overpaying mediocre and crap artists who refuse to improve or even maintain their previous quality because they're getting paid regardless.

Copyrights reward the mediocre and the lazy exactly because the money you are paid depends on your popularity (many people paying small sums that seem reasonable individually). That's why marketing and also reputation, fame, has become more important than the actual art, and when people spend their limited number of dollars on the market, they go to the people with the best marketing departments. All the actually good artists who put their efforts on the content and do something novel that isn't pandering to the smallest common denominator are simply left to starve.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 09:16:19 No.1547274
Add Tag
Semantics of comics being free and being charged for or whatever, this comic is one of the most cringy pieces of autism I have ever seen.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 09:59:59 No.1547292
Add Tag
>>1547206

> You're playing it as if there's no room to haggle - that we should just accept the price as given. That's not how the free market works.
There is always room to haggle, you could simply not buy it (reject the price). In most cases, we have to accept the price, even if we shop around (when there is more than one source), you still accept the price. You do not haggle outside of private party sales. But that is just it, this deals with copyright, a limited (though arguably becoming very corrupted) monopoly over a good. Little different then a patent.
> The value of art is the cost to make it, which means the price you or anyone else is willing to make it for. This value is then subjected to market demand: the valuation by other people. If you want to be paid $20,000 then you better put out something that (a group of) people would actually pay $20,000 for. That is in essence how Patreon was originally meant to work, but then they caved in and let people erect paywalls and begging accounts.
I don’t think you understand the basic principles of economy, of supply and demand. The “Cost to make it” is what? The electricity cost for time and…that’s it? Realistically speaking? How about the cost of programs? The worth of their time? The cost of the computer? Any peripherals used? How much are such works as the Mona Lisa worth then? Art is extraordinarily subjective. What is art to one is trite shit to another. One would pay multiple hundreds of thousands for shit thrown at a canvas, the next? Would beggar you to get that away from them. But then, we are back to the first point. The concept of voting with your wallet. You buy it, or you simply do not. But that gets away from the whole idea of why “piracy” is a thing no?
> It is rare that the work is justly and reasonably compensated for, and this inflates the prices across the whole content producing and media industry. With rights and royalties, and plenty of loose undeserved money to go around, everyone's overcharging everyone and the final customer (you) ends up screwed the most. Point is case: Hollywood is bigger in terms of GDP than the entire agricultural sector of the US. The society is literally paying more for shitty movies than we are for food.
But then…is this a problem with content producers? Or is it a problem in the realm of every Tom, Dick, and Harry running off to buy anything Hollywood produces? But this is also a fantastic example for piracy. I don’t go to the theaters unless it is something the Wife really wants to see or that I am such a fan boy I’ll be dumb with funds. Godzilla, for instance. I’ll go see that. Anything marvel puts out? Meh. If I see it, it has been pirated. If I can’t pirate it, I don’t care to see it. Yet…Hollywood is still putting more cashflow around despite the whole “piracy is mauling the movie industry”
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/03 15:09:19 No.1547376
Add Tag
>>1547274
WHY CAN'T I STOP FAPPING TO IT?
>>
Fascinating! PreppyFinanceNerd 2019/02/04 05:59:06 No.1547586
Add Tag
>>1541188

As someone who holds his degree in and works in the field of finance, I found this comment (and the subsequent responses) a delightful little vignette into behavioral finance.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/04 08:36:52 No.1547633
Add Tag
>>1547586

>Delightful little vignette

I've seen some condescending posts on the web, but this is on another level of condescending douchebaggery.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/04 11:11:42 No.1547667
Add Tag
>>1541188

Can I interest you in some Marxist literature?
>>
PreppyFinanceNerd 2019/02/04 12:53:05 No.1547689
Add Tag
>>1547633

Considering that was my second post of all time on this website, I'm flattered! :-p

More specifically, could you provide detail as to what about it would be condescending or douchebaggy?

I mean that seriously. This is my life's work, my bookshelf is overflowing with finance texts. I'm not sure how my word choice would connote being condescending.

As someone who was raised upper-middle-class and (through a series of wild events) wound up with a bunch of poor friends, they often say the same thing. Yet when I speak with my friends who are of the same class, they do not.

I'd be interested to find out why that is.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/04 13:39:47 No.1547702
Add Tag
>>1547689

Hmm. Well, if you have found success in life doing something you're proud of, I'm happy for you. No snarkiness or backstabbing there, honestly.

I'm not sure what country you're from, but for some reason I assume the UK. I was raised middle-middle class in the USA, for perspective's sake.

When I see people using "fancy" phrases or more unusual words (those outside the scope of every day conversation), I find they're usually very pretentious, attemping to impress those around him/her by sounding more intelligent.

What always winds up happening though, is he/she winds up sending the message "you're lesser than me", "you're less intelligent than me", "I'm better than you", "you're inferior", whether they mean to do that or otherwise.

About the only time this effect doesn't happen, is when a more technical conversation is taking place, a conversation which makes those same words relevant, not just crammed in for the purpose of projecting an image.


....Not to mention just about everyone here (including myself) is a bit of a dick in some way, so after a while you tend to put that inflection into all posts made by everyone.
>>
PreppyFinanceNerd 2019/02/04 14:11:56 No.1547713
Add Tag
>>1547702

I'm from New Jersey, actually! But thank you, that was quite the condense explanation.

Rest assured, I talk like this all the time. Perhaps that's what my friends are picking up on. It did wonders for me during my college years, but I find with a relatively robust lexicon that people do say I should use smaller words.

I adore finance and everything about it, and it is my passion. I just enjoy knowledge and edification for their own ends. I suppose in today's world, that *is* a little strange.

I also had a hearty chuckle at how the general 'dickishness' of the internet has calcified the hearts of people on here into thinking everyone is a pretentious jerk.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/05 05:56:20 No.1547909
Add Tag
When is the next page?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/05 06:46:43 No.1547916
Add Tag
>>1547713
This may be my first post ever. I just come here for the pron, but this was a nice discussion to read. Behavioral Economics is an interesting topic (that I just looked up for the first time).

I especially enjoyed the explanation of why unusual verbiage makes the writer sounds like a pompous douche, even in small bursts (is it working yet?). It seems we humans are adept at picking up on these sorts of social cues.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/05 12:20:11 No.1547977
Add Tag
Holy fuck, I just realized something. A civil discussion has taken place on this site.

.....I think hell just froze over.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/05 14:43:31 No.1548005
Add Tag
Nah it didn't freeze over, just dropped a few degrees. They are resolving the issue as we speak.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/09 15:15:33 No.1549612
Add Tag
File: 8EE63135-3FB7-4245-A01F-9330E289558F_u18chan.png - (1.43mb, 1242x2208, 8EE63135-3FB7-4245-A01F-9330E289558F.png)
No one gives a shit about any of these novels you people are writing. Stop bloating the thread and actually discuss shit on the discussion board
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/17 05:51:05 No.1552896
Add Tag
When is the next page?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/02/17 19:27:11 No.1553122
Add Tag
>>1552896

Who knows? Dude doesn't even own a computer or tablet. He does the comic from his friend's house, who probably lives with his parents also.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/03/05 02:47:52 No.1559773
Add Tag
File: D04EXNtVYAANQUB_u18chan.jpg - (153.28kb, 920x1280, D04EXNtVYAANQUB.jpg)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/03/05 04:00:36 No.1559789
Add Tag
DAAAAAAAAAAAAMN
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/22 06:52:47 No.1619679
Add Tag
File: 01_467_u18chan.jpg - (204.99kb, 920x1280, 01.jpg)
part 2
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/22 06:53:08 No.1619680
Add Tag
File: 02_454_u18chan.jpg - (196.95kb, 920x1280, 02.jpg)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/22 19:51:34 No.1619894
Add Tag
>>1619679

Not part 2. Just a mini-comic while work is still being done on part 2. This is the second mini-comic that was done since the end of Repressed Urges.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/22 22:42:14 No.1619956
Add Tag
>>1619894
my bad, it seemed like part two. Thanks for the info
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/24 03:57:11 No.1620623
Add Tag
File: 03_182_u18chan.png - (749.45kb, 920x1280, 03.png)
end of inbetween mini comic
>>
Furrynomous 2020/02/04 12:55:53 No.1709369
Add Tag
Update?
>>
Furrynomous 2020/02/13 19:36:43 No.1713391
Add Tag
jesus christ the art in this comic is atrocious
>>
Furrynomous 2020/02/13 21:42:15 No.1713421
Add Tag
>>1713391

Atleast it's not as bad as that guy that was spamming his art all over the furries and furry comic board
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 00:56:28 No.1745342
Add Tag
This comic is dead in sight
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 06:37:37 No.1745465
Add Tag
Maybe because this is part one and not part two which is in a different thread?
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 07:06:38 No.1745469
Add Tag
>>1745342

Good.
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 15:28:23 No.1745610
Add Tag
>>1745469
No, no good, I really wanted to see sequel to this comic.
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 20:33:08 No.1745740
Add Tag
>>1745610
got some good news for ya, bud
>>1670680
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/28 21:14:37 No.1745766
Add Tag
>>1745610

Yes, good. This comic is awful.
>>
Furrynomous 2020/04/29 18:14:33 No.1746241
Add Tag
I'm glad my comics aren't getting uploaded here. They'd get thrown to the wolves.

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 1.04 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.