Advertisement
Advertisement
/c/ - Furry Comics
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Media ID
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: Diplomatic-cover_u18chan_u18chan.png - (962.87kb, 1310x1600, Diplomatic-cover_u18chan.png) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Stellar Voyages by Eric W. Schwartz Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:27:07 No.1605701   
Add Tag
Star Trek: The Next Generation parody comic.
Expand All Images
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:27:52 No.1605702
Add Tag
File: Diplomatic-Page01_u18chan_u18chan.png - (1.57mb, 1280x1800, Diplomatic-Page01_u18chan.png)

>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:27:54 No.1605703
Add Tag
File: Diplomatic-Page02_u18chan_u18chan.png - (1.66mb, 1280x1800, Diplomatic-Page02_u18chan.png)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:27:56 No.1605704
Add Tag
File: Diplomatic-Page03_u18chan_u18chan.png - (1.55mb, 1280x1800, Diplomatic-Page03_u18chan.png)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:27:58 No.1605705
Add Tag
File: Diplomatic-Page04_u18chan_u18chan.png - (1.61mb, 1280x1800, Diplomatic-Page04_u18chan.png)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:28:01 No.1605706
Add Tag
File: Diplomatic-Page05_u18chan_u18chan.png - (1.91mb, 1280x1800, Diplomatic-Page05_u18chan.png)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:28:03 No.1605707
Add Tag
File: diplomatic-page06_u18chan.jpg - (272.53kb, 910x1280, diplomatic-page06.jpg)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:28:05 No.1605708
Add Tag
File: diplomatic-page07_u18chan.jpg - (289.63kb, 910x1280, diplomatic-page07.jpg)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:28:07 No.1605709
Add Tag
File: diplomatic-page08_u18chan.jpg - (327.49kb, 910x1280, diplomatic-page08.jpg)
>>1605702
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/24 10:30:07 No.1605710
Add Tag
Thanks for posting! You are the best!

I love how perfectly the author nailed Wesley Crusher`s character!
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/26 20:10:41 No.1606671
Add Tag
There needs to be a part 2 to this
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/26 20:31:10 No.1606675
Add Tag
Can someone photoshop the crap out of this so its only the fap material? Or troll me and photoshop it out. Either one.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/27 10:47:23 No.1606918
Add Tag
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/30 06:08:14 No.1607950
Add Tag
File: Lego-type-STrek-figures-dtqyee71fl7rfwzgurt8_0_u18chan.jpg - (448.49kb, 1355x460, Lego-type-STrek-figures-dtqyee71fl7rfwzgurt8.jpg)
I like how extremely widespread the dislike of Wesley Crusher is. This comic shows it perfectly! Just take a look at the official LEGO version of TNG: does this look like the designers appreciate the character any more than we do?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/06/30 06:10:50 No.1607951
Add Tag
>>1607950

He nearly killed the show in the fans' eyes, by being an Insufferable Genius and an admitted Canon Sue for Gene Wesley Roddenberry. Whenever the other characters weren't praising him undeservedly, they were rudely dismissing him undeservedly, depending on which one would make him look better. Even worse was the 1987 Writer's Strike, which left the network sitting on a ton of unused "Wesley Saves The Day" scripts as most of what they had to work with. (Ironically, these episodes are generally considered So Okay, It's Average, making him marginally more likable when he's the focus character, as opposed to when he's given such a large role in other episodes.) It got so bad that even Wil Wheaton, the actor who played him, hated his guts. He became a bit more bearable with the 5th season episode, "The First Duty", where he screws up big time by participating in an illegal stunt that gets a schoolmate killed and then attempting to cover it up, and for once he isn't Easily Forgiven, or otherwise allowed to get away with it. Instead, this leads to him being bawled out by Captain Picard and getting that school year's marks voided. Eventually he was Put On A Shuttlecraft and the character disappeared from the series, only coming back for the near-final episode Journey's End, and finally being cut out of a cameo appearance on Star Trek: Nemesis.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/03 09:51:03 No.1609181
Add Tag
So... what do you guys think about the new, upcoming "Picard" show which is supposed to continue TNG?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/10 11:03:58 No.1612092
Add Tag
>>1609181

It is going to suck diddley-dick. "All Good Things..." was the perfect ending. I really don`t need a fucking show where our beloved Captain is an old fuck-up. Hollywood fucks everything up these days. They should leave TNG alone and do a show which takes place like 1000 years in the future.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/29 13:31:59 No.1622830
Add Tag
File: WesleyCrusherSUCKS_u18chan.png - (276.53kb, 795x355, WesleyCrusherSUCKS.png)
I love how perfectly the artist captured Wesley Crusher. Damn, I hated this character as a kid. What a fucker.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/29 20:20:45 No.1622989
Add Tag
>>1622830
His irritating OC'ness makes a bit more sense when you know Gene Roddenberrys' full name was Eugene Wesley Roddenberry
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/30 05:50:15 No.1623130
Add Tag
>>1622989

I didn`t know this. Does this mean that Wesley is a stand-in for Roddenberry himself? How weird is that?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/30 05:57:33 No.1623133
Add Tag
File: scrappy-doo-header2_u18chan.jpg - (93.32kb, 1000x500, scrappy-doo-header2.jpg)
>>1622830
you are not alone. i hated him as well. come to think of it, i have never met someone who actually liked wesley crusher. he must be among the least popular characters in all of fiction, right next to scrappy doo and jar jar binks.

>>1622989
i have heard it somewhere. it exaplins why wesley is such a mary sue. he is literally a perfect personified version of roddenberry himself.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/31 07:56:37 No.1623716
Add Tag
>>1609181

I have seen the trailer. It looks like the usual abramstrek garbage. I am really not interested into watching a tv show version of fucking "Into Darkness" (yuck!). Nah, I am going to watch "Orville". It is by no means perfect, but much closer to the Star Trek shows I used to love as a kid.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/07/31 08:05:32 No.1623719
Add Tag
>>1609181
>>1623716
Yep. I am going to skip the "Picard" show. I really don`t wanna see these motherfuckers raping TNG. Lets watch "Orville" instead.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/19 10:04:39 No.1633550
Add Tag
We definitely need more furry TNG comics (TOS would be fine as well)!!!

Damn, why does Trek mix so well with furry stuff?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/19 10:26:23 No.1633556
Add Tag
>>1633550
star trek is like coke, it goes with everything.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/19 11:37:40 No.1633589
Add Tag
>>1633556
except Pepsi. Coke and Pepsi doesnt come along.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/19 16:45:06 No.1633668
Add Tag
>>1633589
i agree, it tastes awful.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/20 16:54:24 No.1634147
Add Tag
Star Trek has always confused me. Why the hell can they teleport things but still have to use spaceships and phasers? Wouldn`t the power to control matter turn you into a demigod or something? Why do people in their world from heart attacks and still age if they have this immense power? This just never made any sense to me. Their technological levels are absurd: they are similar to someone who has nuclear power and supercomputers but who doesn`t know how to clean his teeth.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/22 17:09:41 No.1634932
Add Tag
>>1634147

Star Trek is shit. It is about some ultra-moral crypto-communists on a mission to save the universe from itself. I especially like "the enemies" of the federation: the Romulans for example just seem to wanna be left alone, the Klingons are nationalists and the Borg are more competent high-tech communists (the Borg at least don`t pretend to be moralfags the whole time, they just take what they want). I love the "evil capitalist" Ferengi, because they have better tech than the entire federation combined, which is really amusing (apparently a single capitalist planet is more powerful than an entire, galaxy spanning federation of crypto-communists. LOL!). Anyway, I never liked Trek. What is even worse is how retarded (watch any episode of the original series. It is utter shit.) and boring (watch the first movie and half of the episodes of TNG, VOY and DS9) it is. Do yourself a favor and watch "The Expanse" or "Firefly", both shows are immensely better than anything Star Trek could come up with. This comic is actually more entertaining than any episode of Star Trek I have ever seen (I had a girlfriend who was a obsessed Trekkie and had to endure a lot of these awful episodes. Thankfully we live in a world where beer exists!).
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/22 17:13:43 No.1634934
Add Tag
>>1634932

>I love the "evil capitalist" Ferengi, because they have better tech than the entire federation combined, which is really amusing (apparently a single capitalist planet is more powerful than an entire, galaxy spanning federation of crypto-communists. LOL!).

damn! you are right! i have never thought about this before but you are right! the ferengi do have at the very least the same level of advanced technology like starfleet, yet they are only a single species from a single planet! why have i never noticed this? i have watched ds9 religiously.

Edited at 2019/08/22 17:14:22
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/23 08:13:37 No.1635207
Add Tag
>>1634934
The Ferengi had a head start. They bought warp drive before our 1947, meaning a nice one with all the bugs worked out, not the NX-01 engine. Their Borg designation was 180, so they got around fast. That's what happens when you buy nice things instead of developing crappy prototypes and dragging along.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/23 11:02:53 No.1635267
Add Tag
>>1635207

Good point. The Ferengi have always been my favorites in the Star Trek galaxy. Do you know what always confused me? Why are there no pro-Borg humans in Star Trek? We have quite a lof of crazy cults in our times and days, so I see no reason to assume that there wouldn`t be people in the far future who would be willing to join the Borg collective. Where are the people who go "lets join the Borg!"? It just always confused me. If the Borg were real in our current time, we would have plenty of people who would not only be alright with the idea of getting assimilated, but we would have people who would actively want to join the Borg collective. Maybe its just me, but it always struck me as unbelievable how extremely conformist the people in Star Trek are. There are no nudists, no people with opposing political views, no religious, no philosophical schools etc. there is just the federation`s mono-culture.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/23 11:24:42 No.1635272
Add Tag
>>1635207
>>1635267

Have you guys ever noticed that the Ferengi tech is like WAY above anything the federation has? The holodeck on the Enterprise (the state-of-the-art flagship of the Federation) has injured and killed many people. The holodecks run by bartender Quark on DS9 however have never killed anybody. How the hell does a small barkeeper have superior technology than the flagship of the Federation?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/23 12:48:16 No.1635300
Add Tag
>>1635272
this doesnt surprise me at all. the ferengi engineer gets paid to do his work, while the slaves of the federation have to risk their lives for zero compensation. no wonder their tech is shit. i wouldnt go to great efforts if i was one of their slaves. and lets be real here: they are slaves. you cannot tell me that people who do not get paid would want to serve as redshirts in starfleet. the ferengi are quite clearly superior to the federation. even the dominion is better. they allow jake sisko as press member on board of deep space nine after their occupation. did the federation allow enemy news reporters on their space station? no?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/24 09:24:57 No.1635615
Add Tag
>>1635300

Good point. It is indeed hard to ignore the fact that most people in the Federation are factually slaves (in this case people owned by the state, not private persons). Think about what a shit life the average redshirt must have. They only live to be killed of in the shittiest way possible.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/24 09:35:02 No.1635619
Add Tag
File: VsLku-1487871809-7887-list_items-trekdetails_viewscreen_u18chan.gif - (1.78mb, 300x300, VsLku-1487871809-7887-list_items-trekdetails_viewscreen.gif)
The Original Series had terrible acting, terrible fight scenes, terrible writing, terrible directing, and terrible everything else. Just plain terrible. I am serious. It is terrible. The only thing which impressed me is the effect of the view screen.

Edited at 2019/08/24 09:35:38
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/24 09:42:06 No.1635621
Add Tag
>>1635619

OK folks, I've had a hard time coming to grips with this, seeing as how I grew up on Star Trek when I was a kid... but here goes:

(deep breath)

Star Trek (The Original Series) sucked.

Not only did it suck, but it sucked long and hard. It sucked on many different levels, some obvious, some sublime. While I applaud the concept, the execution of that concept was awful, even for the time, and even for their given budget.

I'd like to say how at least the actors excelled... but I really can't. Everybody knocks down William Shatner, but tell me, is George Takei really any better? Could any two actors in Hollywood do worse accents than Jimmy Doohan and Walter Koenig? How about the wooden performances of Nichelle Nichols and Majel Barrett? I'll give you Leonard Nimoy and DeForrest Kelley if you like, but that still leaves a whole lot to be desired.

The writing is constantly lauded, but come on... can you really make it through an entire episode without cringing? I loved "The City on the Edge of Forever" (Harlan Ellison), but after that? Even some of the better episodes, like "The Trouble with Tribbles" (David Gerrold) and "Amok Time" (Theodore Sturgeon) contained lines of dialogue and scenes of such thesbian contortionism that you have to just sit and stare.

And as for some of the other storylines... how many freakin' alternate Earths can there possibly be? Let's see, we have a planet modeled after the Roman Empire, the hippie free-love movement, the American Indians, and 1930's Chicago. Through various manipulations, we have been subjected to Abraham Lincoln, Genghis Khan, Jack the Ripper, and a giant louffa. Some of the episodes are so bad that their very name elicits a shudder, even among the most die-hard Trekker. ("Spock's Brain", anyone?)

I won't knock the special effects... yes, I know the show's entire FX budget was only $1.57... and I know that it was light years ahead of it's time, but... aaargh... OK, let me just say this: if I see one more scene of stock footage of the Enterprise firing at something just off screen (ship to the top-right corner, firing down), I'll have to take a stick and start beating things.

I do appreciate some of the little things: the transporter effect, the sound effects, the choice of music... but for the most part, folks... and this is coming from a fan... we all need to come to grips with the fact that Star Trek sucked. Lots of other TV shows also sucked around this time -- I Dream of Jeannie comes to mind -- but we don't revere Rogner Nelson and have convention panelists debate "The Physics of the Tiny Glass Bottle", do we?

I mean, come on!
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/24 09:46:16 No.1635622
Add Tag
>>1635621
this is quite understandable. it is really bad. i actually love old sci-fi stuff, yet i cannot get over the cringe worthy writing. i like the costumes, effects and ship designs though. it really is the writing which kills the show for me. tng is better, but i hate the constant heavy handed preaching. i like however that ews did a tng parody.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/24 11:09:10 No.1635648
Add Tag
>>1635621

Fuck Star Trek. Galaxy Quest and The Orville are WAY better.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/25 00:28:17 No.1635862
Add Tag
Star Trek is one of the shows in which the concepts and themes I can appreciate as an adult, but still never get round to watching cos, y'know.. Star Trek.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/25 06:34:31 No.1635972
Add Tag
>>1635862

Well said. I feel the same. The part where Kirk has a fight with a silly lizard man is just to stupid for words.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/26 21:08:24 No.1637129
Add Tag
>>1635648

That doesn't make sense. Galaxy Quest and The Orville are love letters to Star Trek.

Unless you mean Discovery. Fuck Discovery.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 06:49:31 No.1637357
Add Tag
>>1637129

I meant Discovery. Discovery pisses on everything Star Trek once was. Kinda irony that The Orville is closer to the original Star Trek than Discovery.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 07:51:20 No.1637373
Add Tag
>>1637357
Correction: The Orville is closer to what original Star Wars tried to be.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 10:18:16 No.1637420
Add Tag
>>1637373

What do you mean? Star Wars was supposed to be a mix between old samurai movies, wild west movies and space operas ala Flash Gordon. The Orville seems to imitate Star Trek The Next Generation.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 12:43:25 No.1637458
Add Tag
>>1637420
*Trek
Sorry, slip up.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 12:48:25 No.1637461
Add Tag
>>1637458

I agree. The Orville does a good job being a spiritual successor to the original series.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 12:49:38 No.1637462
Add Tag
>>1637458
what is your favorite trek show and movie, if i might ask?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 20:37:45 No.1637614
Add Tag
>>1637462

Trek show? Deep Space 9

Trek movie? Wrath Of Khan
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/27 21:51:19 No.1637629
Add Tag
>>1637461

So a show that features:
- a female doctor with a precocious son
- a robot who explores its humanity and has sex with a woman on the ship
- two bridge crew with a pre-existing romantic connection
- a member of a bumpy-headed alien race who is tall and stern and gains a son
- a navigator who is promoted to head of engineering
- a ship with kids and civilians and a bar
- Brannon Braga as an executive producer

is supposedly the "spiritual successor to the original series"?
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 06:06:19 No.1637737
Add Tag
>>1637629

It is a spiritual successor to TNG, which is a direct successor of TOS.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 08:27:59 No.1637790
Add Tag
>>1637629
I think they meant "the original series" (TNG) not "The Original Series" (TOS).
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 10:45:23 No.1637843
Add Tag
>>1637790

I agree. I meant Star Trek The Next Generation. I had no idea that people refer to Star Trek (1966-1969) as "The Original Series". What a confusing title. Wasn`t TNG "original" as well? Star Trek (1966-1969) is just called "Spaceship Enterprise" in my own language.

Edited at 2019/08/28 10:46:19
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 10:50:27 No.1637847
Add Tag
>>1637790
>>1637843
"original series" is really confusing. i think what people mean by "original" is "classic". they should call the show with kirk and spock "star trek classic". "original" in most languages means that something is an original piece of work, such as a painting, etc. is produced by the artist and not a copy.

however, it can also mean the following in the anglo-saxon languages: "existing since the beginning, or being the earliest form of something".
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 16:52:47 No.1637963
Add Tag
>>1635621
I agree. I too hate it. What is weird, is the fact that I actually love old sci-fi stuff. I love "Raumpatrouille Orion" (a German sci-fi show) and "Twilight Zone". I think what really kills TOS for me is the terrible writing and bad acting. The show is just so bad. People say stuff like "you just don`t like it because you love special effects". Not true. The effects are one of the better part of the show. I like the characters and the ship. I like the tech. But all of the stories feel like some dude took LSD and read the fairy tales from the Brothers Grimm and then turned his trip and the tales into an episode. It feels like a carnival of crapiness.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 16:58:33 No.1637968
Add Tag
>>1635621
>>1637963

I love TNG, I love VOY, I like DS9 and Enterprise.
I tolerate TOS Movies
I can't stand watching TOS episodes. They insult me.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/28 22:45:55 No.1638031
Add Tag
>>1637968

It really varies, when it comes to the Old Series.
There were some REALLY shitty episodes, like "Spock's Brain."
(Spock gets his brain put back in by Dr McCoy. Suprisingly, it works!)

There was good comedy, "The Trouble With Tribbles."

Moral dillemas that are "solved" with stupid ideas. (Give miners gas masks, and everything is all hunky-dory.)

And of course, Kirk having to let a woman die or his universe dies.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/29 05:54:42 No.1638129
Add Tag
>>1638031

You have a point. I do not know why, but despite my best efforts, I always reminded lukewarm when it came to the original series. Maybe it is because I always felt alienated by the outdated political references or the weird type of humor they were going for. TNG was just closer to the time I knew (being a late 80s kid).
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/29 10:29:21 No.1638227
Add Tag
>>1638129

It can really vary with TNG too.
Really good episodes, like the 2-part "Best Of Both Worlds," Picard becomes a Borg drone.

And really shitty ones, like when the crew got this weird virus or something that made them act drunk.
And I was so happy when they stopped the "Wesley Crusher saves the universe" episodes.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/29 10:56:35 No.1638237
Add Tag
>>1638227

True. I fully agree. I remember the episode with the gigantic douchebag "Captain Okona". They try to present him as some sort of mix between James Bond and Captan Kirk, yet he comes off as some mix between J. Quintana (from Big Lebowski) and Zapp Brannigan from Futurama.

I just remembered the weird episode about pseudo-evolution, where the crew members get turned into animals. Somehow Data`s cat turned into a lizard? It was really weird, because people were turning into species which are not closely related to them (Picard was slowly turning into a capuchin monkey if memory serves). It was just really weird.

Let me say that it is a pleasure to meet a fellow Trekkie on here! Let us raise our Earl Grey tea cups!
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/29 15:23:13 No.1638349
Add Tag
>>1638237

I like calling myself a "Charter Trekkie," since I've been a Trek fan since 1966. (!)

And I really detest the JJ Abrams Trek.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/29 22:38:54 No.1638476
Add Tag
>>1638227
>>1638237
Yeah, there are some stinkers, but it's not the same kind of hit-and-miss as TOS.
Most of TNG's bad episodes were in the first 2 seasons.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/30 06:35:11 No.1638622
Add Tag
>>1638349

>I like calling myself a "Charter Trekkie," since I've been a Trek fan since 1966. (!)

One of the original Trekkies on here? You honor us with your presence, Sir!

>And I really detest the JJ Abrams Trek.

Same here. I wish I would never have seen these terrible movies. Abrams is the cinematic Anti-Christ as far.

>>1638476

Well said! TNG improved over time while TOS became worse and worse. Some of the last episodes of TOS ("And the Children shall lead") are among the very worst episodes ever made.
>>
Furrynomous 2019/08/30 14:27:20 No.1638788
Add Tag
>>1638622

Yup, I was 6 years old when Trek started, and some of the episodes scared the shit out of me! ("Lights of Zetar" and "Charlie X")

In the early 70's, I put up with bad animation to see the animated Star Trek. Good story writers and most of the original cast.
(And M'Ress, m'rowww…)

I went to the infamous 1976 Chicago Trek convention.
Overcrowded to the extreme.

Hear a few rumors there, one was that Gene Roddenberry was planning a "Trek Phase 2" show.

And I heard that the guy who made that movie "American Graffiti" was making a space movie. Didn't think anything of it...
>>
Furrynomous 2023/04/14 09:57:54 No.2276446
Add Tag
Got a sequel:
>>1960838

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.6 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.