Dat life of Brian reference. Out of nowhere they are in rome it doesn't make any sens.
And yess...... rome is transistion between greek antiquity, where slave flesh served for taking away sexual deviance of the couple life to the feudal Monogamic exogamy, incarnated by teh myth of Tristan and Yseult. But we don't know much about Roman relation to sex, we phallics symbol everywhere, including amulates of virility, but we do'nt know if was items of bad taste or not. Except for the amulets granted to kids... We do not that sexuality morlaity was something linked to social relationship. We know it was higly patrical, and that penetration was sign of domination, and good slef respecting patrian when tasting the flesh of otehr men, should always be the one active and penetrating.
https://youtu.be/NJEI51FepIk
That guy explain it all.. I mean to understand our relationship to sexuality would you go on uporn??? I mean yess but that would not explain it all.... I mean Roman art tolerate the representation lot of thing that was considered morally wrong....
Wihc is why we think romans were perverted prudes....
|