Advertisement
Advertisement
/c/ - Furry Comics
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Media ID
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: DOGS_Pg1_HD_u18chan.jpg - (2.67mb, 2309x3000, DOGS_Pg1_HD.jpg) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
(VGLewds) Big Dog Energy Furrynomous 2021/10/24 03:48:21 No.2027259   
Add Tag

Expand All Images
>>
(VGLewds) Big Dog Energy Furrynomous 2021/10/24 03:48:26 No.2027260
Add Tag
File: DOGS_Pg2_HD_u18chan.jpg - (2.5mb, 2309x3000, DOGS_Pg2_HD.jpg)
>>2027259
>>
(VGLewds) Big Dog Energy Furrynomous 2021/10/24 03:48:31 No.2027261
Add Tag
File: DOGS_Pg3_HD_u18chan.jpg - (2.79mb, 2309x3000, DOGS_Pg3_HD.jpg)
>>2027259
>>
(VGLewds) Big Dog Energy Furrynomous 2021/10/24 03:48:35 No.2027262
Add Tag
File: DOGS_Pg4_HD_u18chan.jpg - (3.44mb, 2768x3596, DOGS_Pg4_HD.jpg)
>>2027259
>>
(VGLewds) Big Dog Energy Furrynomous 2021/10/24 03:48:40 No.2027263
Add Tag
File: DOGS_Pg5_HD_u18chan.jpg - (4.29mb, 2768x3596, DOGS_Pg5_HD.jpg)
>>2027259
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/24 15:16:17 No.2027515
Add Tag
>>2027263
What the fuck is happening
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/24 16:52:01 No.2027545
Add Tag
>>2027262
both her legs appear to be broken, or the artist has no idea how anatomy works
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/24 22:13:40 No.2027633
Add Tag
>>2027545
lol with that art style I would not be concerned with any attempt of realistic anatomy ...
just forget it exists
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/26 01:06:08 No.2028163
Add Tag
This saddens me. I like Scott Ramsoomair's art: but he shouldn't have branched out to porn. His art style works great for slice of life and skit humor: but not for porn.

I get it, porn is fun to draw: especially if nobody draws what you're into: but you eventually you realise you've become the artistic equivalent of a heroin addict that can make their own heroin.

I cant imagine Scott's headspace, but as someone who is coming down off of drawing porn, i dont get it. I can only see this working in a more elton pot style.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/26 09:02:07 No.2028258
Add Tag
Oh, this is actually the creator of VGCats?
Damn, never thought he'd spec into porn.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/26 09:46:13 No.2028262
Add Tag
>>2028258

How is it possible that there are still people who don't know this? He's been doing it for 3 years now.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/26 21:54:37 No.2028598
Add Tag
I actually don't see this type of comics as porn,
more like a type of comedy parody to porn.

You can't take it serious
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/27 09:07:58 No.2028795
Add Tag
>>2028262
VGCats is one of those comics I dropped about 2012 and forgot about.
So this is news to me.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/27 14:44:45 No.2028946
Add Tag
>>2028163
It saddens me that Scott, after all these years, decided to draw porn right at the point where his art has devolved into the the ugliest shit possible.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/27 16:22:39 No.2028973
Add Tag
All these comments make me realise that the only people who are still supporting Scott's pornography are longtime readers/fans.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/27 22:16:41 No.2029074
Add Tag
>>2028946

I remember - back when VG Cats was worth reading- how he got a new drawing pad and kept saying "look how much better my art is," and it immediately looked worse. It's been a downward spiral since, and this had to be like 15 years ago.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/28 15:26:30 No.2029374
Add Tag
>>2029074
>I remember - back when VG Cats was worth reading
Was it though? I think the concept of vidya webcomics simply hasn't aged wel, but yeah VGcats was probably the least cringe of all.

as for the dude's art, it was still decent 2012-2014'ish, no idea why he thinks people want Ren and Stimpy styled porn though.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/28 15:37:42 No.2029377
Add Tag
>>2029374

It's just his current art style that he's been running with. It honestly feels more like he's trying to relearn and practice anatomy with it which is why it comes out as this.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/29 00:43:43 No.2029516
Add Tag
Jesus Christ, I've seen some messed up shit on this site, but this "art" is just disgusting - and I say this is as a longtime VGCats fan.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/29 00:54:48 No.2029521
Add Tag
>>2029516

Then you haven't been exploring this site long enough if you came to that conclusion after seeing this comic.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/29 10:00:40 No.2029609
Add Tag
>>2029521
nah i agree with him. There's bad art and shitty fetishes on this site, but none seem to try as hard in being ugly as this. (Ratcha comes close, but that's rather his/her lack of talent)

The creepy, exaggerated facial expressions, misplaced "humor", everything looking lumpy with extreme lighting and above all: the characters acting like toddlers.

It's as if Scott is actively trying to create something as unarousing as possible. Like he's trying to troll the furry fandom.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/29 10:46:41 No.2029627
Add Tag
>>2029609
Clearly Scott has been playing the long game by pretending to be cool with people drawing VG Catz porn for years then coming out with this as collective punishment for everyone who had been conditioned by all the lewd art out there drawn by other people to look forward to porn drawn by the creator of the series himself

A true mastermind among furry artists, I must say
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/29 14:34:23 No.2029738
Add Tag
>>2029627

Or this is just how he draws currently and you can't stand it because it hurts your eyes.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/10/30 09:42:32 No.2030119
Add Tag
>>2029627
That would be the ultimate trolling :D
I like that idea.
>>
Furrynomous 2021/11/06 10:37:26 No.2033698
Add Tag
I see no issue with this, they dont look like kids now

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.25 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.