Advertisement
Advertisement
/cub/ - Cub
Cub
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif,swf,mp3
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: inkbunny_s_default_mascot_vector_by_pt300-d7vndjz_u18chan.png - (68.52kb, 686x1000, inkbunny_s_default_mascot_vector_by_pt300-d7vndjz.png) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Inkbunny siterip Anonymous 2018/08/12 15:00:48 No.1479308   
Add Tag
Has anyone ever site ripped inkbunny? I mean it's been around for 8 years someone had to have done that by now.
Expand All Images
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/13 16:58:10 No.1479910
Add Tag
I did do some extensive site ripping of inkbunny. I have the stuff on my 1 TB external hard-drive, that has around 100 GB of cub art (96-98% is female/straight cub with some straight shota)
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/14 18:20:08 No.1480364
Add Tag
>>1479910
Can we see it?
>>
Inkbunny siterip Anonymous 2018/08/14 19:07:57 No.1480385
Add Tag
>>1480364
I posted the siterips here: https://allthefallen.ninja/forum/index.php?threads/cute-furry-lolis.116/page-5
I'm still compressing the stuff into zip files, but here's what I have uploaded so far.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/22 07:19:37 No.1484036
Add Tag
Why would you siterip inkbunny? It's free to join, has search functionality, favourites, and gets updated constantly with new stuff. It'll be obsolete the minute it's ripped, what's the point?
>>
Inkbunny siterip Anonymous 2018/08/22 10:31:30 No.1484097
Add Tag
>>1484036
The point is that when the artist wipes their gallery or if and when inkbunny goes defunct, there's at least a form of a backup.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 10:06:01 No.1485760
Add Tag
That actually makes a lot of sense. I really wish people would stop wiping their galleries though, it's really stupid how that's a trend now
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 13:07:48 No.1485812
Add Tag
>>1484036

Because SethPup got rid of his gallery. Someone wants it.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 16:33:05 No.1485869
Add Tag
>>1485760
>>1485812
Another artist that's notorious for wiping their gallery is Justvisiting. His logic is retarded.
> Wipes gallery
>Because I don't want to get into trouble with the law
^ Since when has anyone got into legal trouble for cub?
>Returns to post more cub stuff

My question to this artist is, "If you're paranoid that the law is on your ass, then why do you keep coming back to post more cub art?"

I like this artist's work, but they're basically one of the most annoying when it comes to artists wiping their galley.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 20:03:06 No.1485912
Add Tag
>>1485869
>Since when has anyone got into legal trouble for cub?
It depends on the state, some states consider art of underage characters illegal while some don't give a fuck. It's definitely low on priority though compared to actual real life child pornography and child predators. From what I hear though having this kind of shit can make a sentence worse if you get caught with real CP though but then at that point you're already pretty fucked in the head if you're looking for and saving that kind of shit.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 21:24:45 No.1485946
Add Tag
>>1485912
What's funny is that I hear this argument all the time, yet nobody ever cites any sources of any known cases where someone was prosecuted for cub porn.
All I get is autistic screeching from people that just call me a "pedo".
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 22:35:04 No.1485968
Add Tag
I'd assume the legality of it doesn't truly matter as the issue is proving to a judge that the act of drawing or paying for a drawing of a fictional anthropomorphic animal child, is equal to the act of the physical, mental and sexual abuse that a real human child faces from a paedophile.

Which if you plead innocent is an incredibly difficult thing to do, especially since no-ones actually put the real time and effort into studying the effects of cub porn of people to truly tell us what actual effect it's having on anyone. Meaning the whole idea that its a bad thing is random speculation, just like the idea it's harmless is just random speculation. Both of which are being done by the most untrustworthy people since the people saying it's harmless like and pay for cub porn and the people saying it's dangerous are people that personally don't like it.

So if we're honest when it comes to cub porn none of us actually know anything about it.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/26 23:02:54 No.1485974
Add Tag
>>1485968
>So if we're honest when it comes to cub porn none of us actually know anything about it.

We know it's a fictional drawing of cartoons having sex.

Not unlike a horror novel of a space clown that kills and eats children.

Or a video game where you murder hookers for cash.

Don't be so fucking retarded.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/27 03:03:19 No.1486032
Add Tag
By this logic anyone who has drawn gore or the act of a fictional character dying is a murderer.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/28 17:12:52 No.1486868
Add Tag
>>1485974
Thanks for missing my entire point. Guess I'll just be more blunt and try and dumb it down for you.

We (people who like cub porn) have no scientific evidence to back up that cub porn is harmless. We might know it's harmless because the majority of us that like it don't have any urges towards actual children, but no-one has done any sort of study on it.

When it comes to books, films/tv series, and video games there have been studies on the affects they may or may not have on people, and they proved by a large majority that they don't actually affect us in any way to make us do things that we shouldn't.

Drawn images like cub porn haven't been studies, mainly because no-one wants to pay for a study. You know why they don't? Because the only way to refer to cub porn on professional, scientific and legal documents is "child pornography".

What I was trying to say, is we need evidence to back us up that cub porn isn't harmful, because contrary to popular belief some furs have served time for having cub porn, but only when they plead guilty. This means the court has accepted that cub porn is evidence of paedophilia. We need to change that if we want to even try to tackle the negative stigma.

Oh but who am i kidding, the only people that might actually benefit from that would prefer to come to boards with cub porn on, and call people they disagree with, don't understand what they're talking about, or just don't like for no apparent reason a retard...right?
>>
Karrika 2018/08/30 16:36:11 No.1487812
Add Tag
I don't know how people get to like anything like this. Always liked grown and natural looking women. But then I met my girlfriend. Over years she did not change almost at all. So 10 years later she looks 15 still. All I can say is that I developed attractiveness to size difference porn because I like her.

Edited at 2018/08/30 16:36:56
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/30 18:10:02 No.1487842
Add Tag
>>1486868
>>1485974
Anon, I'm not missing your point. I'm not calling you a retard because I disagree with you, I'm calling you a retard because your entire argument is fundamentally absurd. Even if you weren't fundamentally absurd and retarded, the burden of proof would still be on you.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/30 18:52:40 No.1487864
Add Tag
>>1487842
Okay so telling me my argument is flawed and then...not explaining how it's flawed is helpful...how?

Since my point is we have no legally backed proof that cub porn is harmless, we just have our own assumptions which being fans of cub porn, is obviously biased. So my point that we have no scientific evidence to back us up is flawed...how?

If you're just gonna call an argument or point retarded for being flawed without actually explaining why it's flawed isn't helpful at all.

Since we have evidence of Video Game violence studies: https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2018/research/no-evidence-to-link-violence-and-video-games/

Evidence of Film violence studies: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13718

Evidence of Book violence studies: https://psmag.com/social-justice/reading-fiction-impacts-aggressive-behavior-35839

But none specific to the desire of paedophiles on their exposure to drawn images of anthropomorphic children. Heck most studies focus on general media when trying to locate these sorts of studies, because that's what we are dealing with.

Oh and i found my proof of the studies using Google. I'd assumed the users on here were intelligent enough to use said search engine or another alternative...my mistake.
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/30 20:36:03 No.1487891
Add Tag
>>1487864

Your argument being absurd is self evident.

The study on video games doesn't include new VR releases. I guess that means people who are going to play new VR third person shooters that haven't come out yet are going to turn into school shooters, right? I mean, you don't have any proof that they won't, therefore it's safe to assume that they will.

And "legally backed proofs" isn't even a thing, retard.

"I found my proof on Google."

Sure you did. Where'd you get your law degree? University of /pol/?
>>
Anonymous 2018/08/31 19:36:42 No.1488461
Add Tag
>>1487891

It's painfully obvious that you are missing his point. He's not saying that cub art does have an impact. He's not saying that it doesnt. He's saying that he'd rather have a study to find actual evidence of either side before just throwing out broad general statements.

perhaps you should brush up on your reading skills and cool off in the meantime instead of instantly assuming that the person you're talking to is against you.
>>
Anonymous 2018/09/01 23:26:34 No.1489132
Add Tag
>>1488461
Yes, thank you. Someone that got it.

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.28 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.