Advertisement
Advertisement
/d/ - Discussion
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif,swf,mp3
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: 173_2_u18chan.jpg - (12.51kb, 600x450) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
U-18Chan Q&A and where to get answers Ro Koji !RoKoji3/cM # ADMIN # 2017/08/08 13:34:27 No.1303650    [Reply]
Making a new thread for questions and discussion of site operations and rules.

If you have any questions on why a post was removed or other staff actions post it here. I'll keep an eye on this thread and respond when I can or find another admin or mod that can.

Official discord server link http://discord.gg/qWwmrn7
815 post(s) and 39 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
. Chatin # MOD # 2025/04/27 00:29:17 No.2458721
It is planned, but we have no eta. Site needs some code changes before we turn it back on.

Currently if our user base uses the feature it bogs the site down to a snail.

As for requests if it was placed in request/source idk. If it was placed outside of request it might have been deleted being placed outside the proper section.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/05/15 04:14:47 No.2464622
:/
>>
Furrynomous 2025/05/20 03:03:54 No.2466226
The site loading is awful. A website from the 1990s using dialup loads better than this shit.

File: 1571447595.furrywrecker911_bishopsbanhammer_finalv2_fw911_u18chan.png - (1.33mb, 2500x850) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
The Porn Ban Bills Thread Furrynomous 2025/05/25 15:59:05 No.2467468    [Reply]
IODA, TIDA, KOSA, SCREEN, insert here yet another stupid word acronym for a bill to kill internet porn in the US.
It's not the first time and looks like it won't be the last.

As an outsider who probably doesn't have all the latest info, I've got concerns about what this means for this and many of our beloved places.
Is there really a writing on the wall about an impending pornapocalypse?
Edited at 2025/05/25 16:19:38
6 post(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/03 05:44:42 No.2469708
> even so I wouldn't demonize porn, because as addictive as it could be; the fault lied with me for never making the effort to change.

Not anyone's fault as long as you're conscious about you being a porn addict. Just like any other addiction, sometimes it just seems to happen without any visible explanation, and it's a struggle so hard that even the most herculean effort you'd take might seem like it'd put you at a standstill sometimes.

Recently I've come to terms with the fact that my sex/porn addiction might have become a part of myself and I don't guilt myself for it, nor think I'm a quitter for stopping to try and change things. I'm simply living my ordinary life while trying to make it manageable so it doesn't hamper neither my well being nor others', and if I need help to do that, I can ask for it without feeling any shame. Just because I'm a sex addict doesn't mean I'll become an offender.

Maybe that last thing is just me, but I believe there may be some truth to that and not many people are willing to even consider it. Who knows, maybe it'll even fade off eventually if I keep it checked for long enough.

Still, I think it wouldn't be a farfetched assumption to say that a good handful of Americans, religious or not, are too full of themselves to regard seeking help for their personal issues as something good. And they that they know about vice so well they know how to prevent you from falling into it. But when it comes to the real thing, they don't know what to do to put people back on track, and many addicts themselves seem to actively refuse the help because they say they're "fine", either because they dismiss it as nothing to worry about or something that they themselves will buff right out.

The US may be obsessed about growth in all of its variants, but as far as personal growth goes, they don't really seem to give a shit.

Edited at 2025/06/03 06:32:19
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/19 00:44:08 No.2475752
hate to break it to you but if you think porn addiciton is real your repeating religious bs. the whole thing was started by some creep paster who got outed for sex crimes. its been debunked a dozen times over, porn addicition isnt a thing, its religious guilt in a trenchcoat. so enjoy your porn n have fun it only hurts the pockets of nutjobs who want you to feel bad on sundays
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/19 01:41:12 No.2475762
This really depends what you mean by addiction. You can get addicted to anything, at least in very loose terms of it becoming a repeat habit that you're very unlikely to break.

However it's true, I've never heard of anyone forming a chemical dependence on masturbation. Which is addiction in the sense that we normally think of it; what happens with nicotine for example.

You could argue you do get "withdrawal symptoms" (as we see every in people every November) but I'm not sure if that's actually withdrawal or just what happens in general when you don't jerk off ever. I'm not a urologist, or a pastor. But even if it does count it's probably not really analogous to what drugs do. Nofap withdrawals aren't actively dangerous to your health as far as I know.

File: IMG_6037_u18chan1_u18chan.jpeg - (112.86kb, 621x644) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
the trauma of seeing a vagina Furrynomous 2025/05/13 20:26:38 No.2464060    [Reply]
if you or a loved on were harmed by seeing a character you assumed was gay have sex with a woman in a single piece of some offshoot furry porn you may be entitled to cry about it

from https://u18chan.com/board/u18chan/gc/topic/2449239
18 post(s) and 1 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/14 01:49:12 No.2473862
>>2473767
>I never said "why doesn't everyone like everything?" but I made an entire thread about how gay people don't like straight porn
Gee.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/15 12:41:30 No.2474197
>>2473862
Again that's fine, I don't even like straight furry porn, but did the main guy in question was going insane. Anyway someone said everyone should move to /d/ before the thread gets locked so (it got nuked instead so this is pointless now ig)
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/17 16:25:12 No.2475138
it can be annoying but theres hundreds of other comics out there so I dont get too angry about it

File: Zootopia-Finnick_u18chan.jpg - (149.34kb, 1000x1424) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Genital Type Curious Idiot 2025/03/11 16:18:11 No.2450400    [Reply]
Saw people on the boards complaining about what kind of genitalia a character has (human vs animal) and thought I'd ask what everyone else on here thinks.

Which do you think is better and why?

Personally, I'd say it depends. Personally I generally lean towards animal genitalia because I like to imagine the more social implications of it. Like a canine knot penetrating would be romantic as it would indicate the desire to ensure reproduction with someone you're making love with and could be

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
17 post(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/05/20 23:37:13 No.2466409
>>2464926
You're confusing anatomy with paraphilia. Anthropomorphic characters, regardless of how they may look, are meant to be representations of our human selves, not ordinary animals. Most feral artists specifically go out of their way to clarify that their characters are meant to be perceived as sapient adults for that exact reason. Just because someone might find an anatomically correct fursona attractive does not mean that attraction must extend to real animals.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/10 14:56:43 No.2471980
>>2466409
>You're confusing anatomy with paraphilia.
Paraphilia might be an excuse, but not exclusive with the alternative.

>are meant to be representations of our human selves, not ordinary animals.
Speak for yourself.

>Most feral artists specifically go out of their way to clarify that their characters are meant to be perceived as sapient adults for that exact reason.

Standard boilerplate disclaimers, doesn't mean anything. Nobody would admit it outright, unless they were stupid.

>Just because someone might find an anatomically correct fursona attractive does not mean that attraction must extend to real animals.

That's not the argument. It is that you can't tell the difference unless the person outright admits it. In effect, you get both kinds of people and no way to separate them, so it becomes an ethical problem. The more you emphasize on the animal features, particularly with accurate animal genitalia and precise anatomy in porn, the less plausible it becomes to claim that you're doing it for simple aesthetic choices.

Edited at 2025/06/10 15:14:56
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/17 16:11:55 No.2475134
depends on the art style and story/furry type but otherwise its not a big deal for me

File: Screenshot2025-05-19at18-09-56ShaitCreating3Dart18renderings_animationsPatreon_u18chan.png - (1.21mb, 1898x865) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Shait/Act series Thread Furrynomous 2025/05/19 11:15:36 No.2465966    [Reply]
Honestly, i am kinda suprised one his "Act" series is so popular he manage to have this much salary, despite the fact it's has some pretty hardcore fetish lol.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/17 16:10:09 No.2475133
what fetsihes?

File: SI_GCN_StarFoxAssault_image1600w_u18chan.jpg - (247.99kb, 1600x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Rise of nostalgia Furrynomous 2025/06/09 11:41:32 No.2471602    [Reply]
Just curious on peoples opinion on the rise of the whole "retro" aspect it seems that despite having tons of new themes and options its the games, music, shows, cartoons from the past that catch peoples interests at record high then it ever did. It literally is a subject that is widespread everywhere, social networks constantly have posts and tweets about things and characters from the past, old games, tv shows and movies are mentioned more then ever, various retro themes are becoming increasing

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/09 13:47:31 No.2471623
Nostalgia can be toxic. Very toxic. I can rant for hours on how everything is a sequel or a reboot. Even kids shows aren't original for the kids anymore, they're all reboots made to pander to their millennial parents.

Still though...

John Carpenter's the Thing was a remake; but it was a hard reboot made with purpose. This is the part where I start talking about how creative risks are no longer taken, but they fucked up part is they are.

Transformers One was a damn good original movie.

Bombed at the box office. Nobody went to see it.

Elio looks like an original interesting idea; Disney is burring it in favor of their remakes and reboots of old franchises; but people don't want original. Not really; they'll tell you that, then they'll run right into the embrace of another reboot.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/11 03:27:59 No.2472171
I wonder if future archeologists will even see all the repeat media of this era as distinct creations or just as slightly altered retellings of the same stories. The same way the epic of Gilgamesh kind of went over a lot of iterations over the centuries and is largely "plagiarized" (thought to to be based on, or a version of, several other similar stories from the region and period)

Plus, living in the thick of it we see the original vs. the redo as vastly different, but separated from nostalgia and emotional attachment a future onlooker might see Robocop (1987) as "basically the same film" as Robocop (2014)

And I mean this has been going on a long while when you think about it. A large chunk of Disney movies are fairy tale adaptations so in a way when they get redone it's a remake of a remake. We shouldn't be surprised; they've been doing the "Cashing in on a known IP" thing for pretty much their entire existence. It's just that when it's your own work you're rehashing it's a bit masturbatory. Plus at least adaptations bring some value to entertainment; there's always tons of people who would never have bothered to read the source material but might be very interested in a movie about it because they've heard good things even though they're not book readers.
>>
. Chatin # MOD # 2025/06/14 00:28:16 No.2473856
Can be good in some cases, but in most they are playing on someone's childhood to try and make money.

In many cases... it fails.

I'm also tired of remakes of old games instead of something new. LOOKING AT YOU TODD HOWARD.

File: Screenshot2025-06-11220732_u18chan.png - (9.6kb, 379x111) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
lol, lmao Furrynomous 2025/06/11 22:11:24 No.2472367    [Reply]
I'm still wondering what possibly could've happened for cut vs uncut to get a specific topic ban given how spirally a normal thread can get. Not like I want to talk about it, I'm just wondering what the tenor of the discussion was
>>
. Chatin # MOD # 2025/06/14 00:26:33 No.2473855
Long story short.

A certain artist draws a certain way and it triggers some people.

It became a beating the dead horse with another horse AND IT STILL KEEPS HAPPENING.

Basically a few people couldn't leave it be and now it's BoS.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/15 01:26:38 No.2474080
>>2473855
Sooooo... you three-month or permaban the most egregious offenders and forbid the topic for that specific Meesh comic; a blanket topic ban for all his comics just to be safe with a one-month ban to be EXTRA safe. But an all-out ban of the topic because a few obvious trolls wouldn't take a hint and the mods at the time didn't have the stones to just nuke them from orbit and be done with it? That was the most pussified move I've seen from a forum mod team back then, regardless of staffing issues or personal biases of the topic itself.
Yes, I was there and my jaw would constantly hit the desk every day I checked that thread and I'd go, "How... is this STILL going on? The hell are the mods even doing?"
If that blow-up was the excuse you guys needed to outlaw the very discussion of cut dicks because it was, as a group, that much disliked, well I guess you got that in spades. To be honest, I'm surprised it's not a global rule.
>>
. Chatin # MOD # 2025/06/15 05:56:33 No.2474140
It is global in general, because it bled into other boards, topics and did not stop.

So ya, it got blanket banned because it never stopped. It STILL occurs.

The diplomatic route was attempted. It didn't work. Strategic strikes were attempted. It didn't work. Nuke from orbit was decided upon.

File: Untitled_38_u18chan.jpg - (51.57kb, 512x768) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
How can you tell if an artist is using AI? Furrynomous 2025/05/12 16:02:29 No.2463782    [Reply]
It's easy to tell when someone isn't an artist is using ai to pass as one. Usually they just use the final result as is, without even trying to touch it up.

But what happens when there's an experienced artist using it? How can you tell? They know how to edit a picture. Why would they do such a thing?
11 post(s) and 1 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/05/25 07:36:08 No.2467402
>>2464911
You're basically describing the approaches of artists like Zackary of Zaush even pre-AI though, and yet that never seemed to hold them back.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/10 14:03:15 No.2471945
>>2467402
They are/were criticized for being lazy for simply copy-pasting or tracing backgrounds from 3D models and photos.

You can't demand special prices if you're not doing anything special.^ In that sense, they're de-valuing their own art. That's why the top level artists who are cutting corners are rather relying on status and popularity, exclusivity, or special niche interests to earn money - their selling point is almost everything but the art - but that's a segment of the market that is not accessible to most and takes a long time to become established that way.

^(Mind: back in the day being good with Photoshop was a skill in itself. Nowadays the software is literally holding your hand with the brushwork, and the tricks that took skill and keen eye are already computed as "filters")

Edited at 2025/06/10 14:18:58
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/10 14:46:01 No.2471970
>>2467402
Also, if you track the progress of an artist like Zaush - they started 20 years ago doing entirely hand-drawn art that was skilled, varied and interesting, gaining popularity and fame. Then they started employing more and more digital tools, becoming formulaic and self-similar, pushing for volume and money over quality, and now they're just coasting on their established fame doing the same stuff with less and less effort for the past 10 years.

If you're thinking about jumping from zero to Zaush with the help of AI, you'll be jumping past the peak and going straight for the mediocre and lazy. That won't build you the reputation and fame, or make you interesting as an artist.

File: 1611081798748_0_u18chan.png - (1.03mb, 1522x1600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
UberQuest (& its Creators) Discussion Furrynomous 2021/01/20 21:46:31 No.1885069    [Reply]
Feels like this was long overdue.

For the sake of fewer cleanups over on the /fur/ thread, all discussions of the story, and whatever shit is going down with its creators, Skidd and Phuufy(like how pic related got taken down by them), keep it here.

If you are just in it for the porn, stay there.
>>1101543
351 post(s) and 173 image reply(s) omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/02 08:58:22 No.2469385
File: 950d0e7aaf75eaba39515604a9081262_0_u18chan.png - (220.15kb, 703x1495)
They got some polls going for feedback if anyone cares to let them know what UQ's really worth.

https://strawpoll.com/mpnb1p4RPy5
https://strawpoll.com/wAg3QzmYWy8
https://strawpoll.com/61gD97P2LZw
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/02 12:13:58 No.2469491
It sounds like they're running out of ideas or they want to possibly run away from the scene. Remember they've invested well over fifty thousand on this and it's gotten them nowhere which is likely why they've been trying to do twitch streams as of late but it was found out they've been shelling out even more on 3d models and vtuber models just to make themselves look good.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/03 13:16:48 No.2469828
File: w6CIhBB_u18chan.gif - (2.77mb, 480x270)
An accurate depiction of how these suggestions will be received

File: 1200px-Missing_u18chan.png - (47.8kb, 1200x675) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Search feature Furrynomous 2025/06/01 22:00:36 No.2469294    [Reply]
I'm pretty sure there was one at some point. I cannot find it anymore. Did it get moved somewhere or removed entirely?
>>
Furrynomous 2025/06/02 07:42:55 No.2469378
>>2469294
It was removed. iirc, it was causing problems with site stability after one of the server outages that damaged a bunch of data

Previous [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91]
[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 9.6 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.