>>2420349
I don't have to know how to cook something, to smell and see it is badly cooked.
Why do people use that as a defense? It makes sense in SOME Situations. Such as Blueprint Making, and writing code for a video game. But ANYONE Can tell if a story is good or not, just by the fact if they ENJOY it or not.
Have I ever wrote a book before? No. Have I ever read a book before? Yes. Many. Literally hundreds. Some good, plenty of bad. Some with horrific grammer but amazing story, others with perfect grammer but boring or illogical plothole filled mess.
And this story? It's bad. It's horrifically bad. We literally spent the first half with two characters, only to have one of the characters get killed and now watching through the eyes of the killer for the second half of the story. Not sure if you know this, but it breaks the most basic writing rule of Chekov's Gun. It set up these Characters. It set up their story and life. And then half way through, just killed them and switched over to a different character, with a different story.
Storywise, Everything that happens before the half way point, the characters, history, actions, events, lore, everything is gone and wasted. At which point, what is the POINT of the first half of the story? It has no relivance to the story itself. It only exists to trick readers into thinking they are getting 1 story with porn, only turn kill it and turn into a story with little porn and focused more of a character no one likes, and trying to guilt trip people into feeling bad for him, when he did something unredeemable in killing the character people were ACTUALLY Rooting for and liked.
^ To put this into Context. Imagine if in Aladdin, Jafar killed Aladdin half way through the movie in cold blood, and the rest of the movie switches to Jafar as the main character, and tries to guilt trip you into wanting to redeem him.
Or another more well know set up characters, imagine if Bobba Fett from Star Wars had killed Han Solo half way through Star Wars Episode 5, and the rest of that movie and episode 6 was from Bobba Fett's point of view, and trying to trick people into wanting to redeem him after he kills Han Solo. Heck, let's skip Bobba Fett and go right to what actually DID kill Han Solo, do you think Kylo was a well written and good character who was redeemed for his actions of killing his father in cold blood for no reason, no reward, no plot relevance or anything? I'm willing to bet the answer is No, unless you lie and say yes.
The point being, we don't need to have written books and published them to know if a story is good or not! It's NOT Rocket Science!
Is there Plotholes? Is the Writing Good? Do we like the story? Yes, No, and No. It isn't good writing. Nearly ALL of the comics on this website is bad writing, which is ok, cause most focus on the porn and not the story. And the few that switched to focusing on the Story, namely the 2 Sibling Incest stories, are both hated because of the bad writing getting it the way of good porn. Heck, one of them, the Weekend one by Black-Kitten if I remember right, has even started to REMAKE his original first story, to REWRITE the first comic to better fit the story he made up LATER and fix Plotholes and inconsistancies in his writing, cause he can't even stay in line with what came before, and has to retcon the old comics to fit the newer ones, because he sucks so much at writing. He let his need to write a good story, compromise, fuck up, and destroy his original comic that people liked in the first place, and is not changing it and making people even MORE upset with him. And none of those people need to have written a book to know bad writing, and none of them need to have written a book to know the porn comics are BETTER when it's focused more on the porn, and less on the story.
|
