Advertisement
Advertisement
/fur/ - Furries
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: GT0125_u18chan.jpg - (78.33kb, 1280x720, GT0125.jpg) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Goof Troop 2025 Furrynomous 2025/01/22 02:10:31 No.2434592   
They did Peg Dirty.
Think we'll see porn of her?

Source: https://disneytvanimation.com/post/759189773986529281/artwork-for-a-proposed-goof-troop-reboot-by-becky

Artwork for a proposed “Goof Troop” reboot by Becky Dreistadt and Frank Dreistadt (“Big City Greens”, “Big City Greens The Movie: Spacecation”, “Star Vs. The Forces Of Evil”, Cartoon Network Studios “Steven Universe The Movie”, “Steven Universe Future”) - Circa (2019)

The main core of this proposed reboot was mixing the three Goof Troop universe projects (“Goof Troop”, “A Goofy Movie” and “An Extremely Goofy Movie”) in to one series.

According to Becky Dreistadt one of the main plot points was:

Max loves music and wants to be just like his idol Powerline!

PJ is a popular game streamer but his Dad doesn’t understand.
Expand All Images
>>
Goof Troop 2025 Furrynomous 2025/01/22 02:10:55 No.2434593
File: GT0225_u18chan.jpg - (69.21kb, 1280x720, GT0225.jpg)
>>2434592
>>
Goof Troop 2025 Furrynomous 2025/01/22 02:11:18 No.2434594
File: GT0325_u18chan.jpg - (56.83kb, 1280x720, GT0325.jpg)
>>2434592
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/22 04:22:53 No.2434602
Oh I hate this, I don't hate the CalArts style but holy crap is it overused, lazy and unneeded when the traditional Disney style is objectively better for this franchise.

BTW and not hating but this should be in the discussion thread.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/22 04:48:35 No.2434607
This is a thing? Ugh, why bother? They killed the Ducktales reboot and passed on the Darkwing Duck reboot, and both of those were guaranteed to be better than this.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/23 06:09:44 No.2434996
>>2434592
Wait….Peg was a cat?…….follow-up question, doesn’t this new look make her look like Fran from Litterbox Comics?

Edited at 2025/01/23 06:14:46
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/23 13:37:31 No.2435076
>>2434607
>This is a thing?
no, it isn't, and you would know that if you'd taken the time to read anything in that post but the subject line

not only was this just proposal art, it was from more than five years ago - if this was going to be a thing, it would've already been a thing
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/23 19:59:37 No.2435169
>>2435076
I thought the proposal was from last year, since all the news broke in August 2024.

The circa I thought was related to the creator's older work, Big Greens, Steven Universe, etc etc.
>>
Furrynomous 2025/01/24 02:56:39 No.2435333
>>2435169
okay, fair
>>
Furrynomous 2026/04/20 15:08:31 No.2563320
The nerfed Peg?! Its a travesty!
>>
Furrynomous 2026/04/20 22:56:19 No.2563439
Think they would've gotten Paulie Shore to voice Bobby again?
>>
Furry collector 2026/04/21 07:39:42 No.2563537
O... M... G...
First, Disney thinks people who grew up in the '70s don't exist anymore. Second, they think their new audience is just silly kids. And third, yes, there's someone at Disney who hates the show and decided to nerf it to make it more family-friendly.

I don't know who the idiot in charge at Disney is, but it's ridiculous that they think we'll swallow anything, especially that kind of animation. The original series was pure art, not to mention all the well-known Goofy shorts. Why destroy something so great? If it's because of Peg, please... the world moved on despite that.
Please, someone send a nuclear missile to Disney and rid the world of this ridiculous company. xD

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.14 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.