Advertisement
Advertisement
/gc/ - Gay Furry Comics
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: 01_183_u18chan.jpg - (508.99kb, 998x1541, 01.jpg) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:08:10 No.1210158   
Add Tag
Sequel to: https://u18chan.com/gc/topic/1133265
A bit too short for my tastes, but what can ya do?
Expand All Images
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:08:11 No.1210159
Add Tag
File: 02_173_u18chan.jpg - (491.35kb, 998x1541, 02.jpg)
>>1210158
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:08:13 No.1210160
Add Tag
File: 03_184_u18chan.jpg - (505.87kb, 998x1541, 03.jpg)
>>1210158
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:08:14 No.1210161
Add Tag
File: 04_184_u18chan.jpg - (403.03kb, 998x1541, 04.jpg)
>>1210158
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:09:03 No.1210162
Add Tag
File: 05_188_u18chan.jpg - (470.37kb, 998x1541, 05.jpg)

>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:09:04 No.1210163
Add Tag
File: 06_178_u18chan.jpg - (475.85kb, 998x1541, 06.jpg)
>>1210162
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:09:06 No.1210164
Add Tag
File: 07_169_u18chan.jpg - (471.31kb, 998x1541, 07.jpg)
>>1210162
>>
Public Indecency 2 Hemlyn 2017/01/24 07:09:07 No.1210165
Add Tag
File: 08_167_u18chan.jpg - (452.66kb, 998x1541, 08.jpg)
>>1210162
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 08:11:39 No.1210173
Add Tag
File: 05_188_u18chan_u18chan.jpg - (32.77kb, 307x179, 05_188_u18chan.jpg)
>>1210162

That face...I've seen it in either a horror movie or on a psychopath protagonist -somewhere-. Creepy all the same though.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 10:36:37 No.1210187
Add Tag
This is cringe!! Also they would have just went straight to jail
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 10:55:09 No.1210195
Add Tag
Why is the cum orange?
Plus that was the worst orgy comic ever. It was over before it even happened
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 11:08:35 No.1210199
Add Tag
>>1210173

Killer queen, maybe?
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 11:53:55 No.1210212
Add Tag
The art is nice, but why an elephant... and why it only lasted 2 pages :c
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 14:23:46 No.1210268
Add Tag
>>1210212

I liked the elephant just fine, but yeah the sex was way too short.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/01/24 21:43:27 No.1210382
Add Tag
Few things....

1. Why was the elephent dick permanently flaccid...erectile dysfunction or what?

2. is this not the same artist who did the first one? cause it looks like shit, like they tried to quickly cash in on the first one's success by making this shitty rehash.

3. Massive cringe facial expressions.

4. Just bad...bad comic. bad you (artist).

Where's the passion? Where's the heat, the original comic had it...the art quality is gone too.
>>
K 2017/01/25 11:07:01 No.1210587
Add Tag
The only problem i see here is the page 7. Layout of this page is slightly confusing? At least at first.

Either way the style and art is a big plus to me. It looks awesome and feels like a legit frickin comic ffs, backgrounds are really nice along with the shots/perspectives.

>>1210382
Oh.. and i guess this guy here is on a period or something..
>>
Asmail Rutherford 2017/01/25 12:37:12 No.1210604
Add Tag
>>1210382
As wrote on the cover here, this time it's drawn by Robin Wright (not Zeiro), who also wrote the first part. This is what Wright's art looks like. It's not worse at all IMHO, just vastly different.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/05 11:04:05 No.1216705
Add Tag
Comic isnt that bad just too short. The lady in afterglow on the other side of the mirror window is a nice touch. I also think the dialogue is not terrible, better than jasonafex at least.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/05 11:52:15 No.1216725
Add Tag
File: a-clockwork-orange_u18chan.jpeg - (38.37kb, 568x426, a-clockwork-orange.jpeg)
>>1210173
The way the eyelashes are drawn and that creepy smile remind me of clockwork orange
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/05 13:08:19 No.1216767
Add Tag
>>1210382
>the art quality is gone too.

I just looked at the other comic and I'm flabbergasted that you would consider that mess of squishy garbage as being superior in artistic quality.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/05 19:57:54 No.1216955
Add Tag
>>1216767

And what would you be comparing it to, I certainly hope not this and the first one because if so you have very low standards. You must also like Slyus...high standards for sure.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 15:05:05 No.1218603
Add Tag
Where can I find more art of this Robin Wright fella?
>>
Asmail Rutherford 2017/02/09 15:19:31 No.1218605
Add Tag
>>1218603
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/robinwright
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 16:20:31 No.1218615
Add Tag
>>1216955
I don't know who Slyus is, but being a furry is pretty much synonymous with having terrible standards. That aside,

>And what would you be comparing it to, I certainly hope not this and the first one
I said "I just looked at the other comic," what other than the first comic would you think I'd be talking about?
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 16:55:57 No.1218626
Add Tag
"being a furry is pretty much synonymous with having terrible standards" non-sequitur aside, you might have a better point to make it you weren't on a board for gay furry comics...so the irony is palpable for sure. What does it say about your standards then? Or are you pretending like there's a giant difference between enjoying furry porn and being a furry? It's fairly ambiguous, like being a "troll" online synonymous with anyone you don't like.

did you have a point to make or are you just generally displeased with both comics of the public indecency series? at least when I'm condescending towards a comic I give very specific reasons that are justified.

You're not one of those "the dialogue sucks" people are you? Read a book if you want dialogue. Most want porn.

Edited at 2017/02/09 16:58:34
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 19:32:08 No.1218659
Add Tag
File: speakingofcringefacialexpressions_u18chan.png - (85kb, 238x174, speaking of cringe facial expressions.png)
>>1218626
>you might have a better point to make it you weren't on a board for gay furry comics...so the irony is palpable for sure.

Apparently not palpable enough since you're too autistic to read humorous sarcasm without taking it seriously. You're trying really hard here though so I'll give you a nice response.

I made my point, it was simple and complete, while you (or whoever I'm talking to, I'm just going to assume you're that anon) think the art in the first comic is better, I disagree. I doubt there's much more of a discussion to be had here that won't just end up in us accepting that we have a difference in opinion, but just for you I'll try.
I would say the second artist's abilities are all around superior, his shading, anatomy, colors, backgrounds, I see them as being of higher quality and more on par with professional comic standards where as the first comic is more in league with typical substandard internet comics.
I think the framing in the panels of the second comic are better. The second comic's panels are more detailed, dynamic, and varying. The artist for the first comic after the first establishing scenery shot does everything they can to be as close to the characters and repetitive as possible so they don't have to draw as much and what they do draw can be really simple. There are far too many close up shots in the first comic, the images can't breathe and I can hardly see what's happening. The second comic doesn't show enough sex while the first comic doesn't know how to show it.

I also dislike the anatomy and style of the first comic's characters, they look squishy in a not cute cartoony way but more of an "I like anime but don't know how to draw" sort of way. You complained about facial expressions in the second comic, but I think cat boy's faces in the first one are way worse. I dislike the color scheme of the first comic as well, ugly gray on purple and blue, why is it so fucking dark in that restaurant, do the lights not work?
When it comes to the the character designs I'm not gonna say it's much of a real point, but just to bring it up, I feel like the more stupid design aspects of the characters are more bearable in the second comic due to what I feel is superior art. I'm glad the second artist did what he could to hide the fucking teal dog dick.

There ya go, those are some thoughts of mine.

I love how you brought up dialogue, like I said anything about either comic's worthless dialogue. But to answer your question, I'm one of those "dialogue can be important, if it's supposed to be important" people.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 20:40:12 No.1218677
Add Tag
>>1218659

Sarcasm huh? Well...Poe's law. Sarcasm is conveyed through vocal keys, very difficult through dry text.

See what you can do when you actually apply yourself, you are able to form coherent intelligent thoughts and perspectives. I'm proud of you. Less 'derr its shit' and more of what you just did is far more helpful to the world. Less opinion, more justification.

Now I respect your analysis, despite disagreeing with it. Not a fan of the crayon coloring, the old spiderman 1970s comic style, the wonky facial expressions, the unnecessary camera angles showing the weirdest cliche scene intros, the 'eat your entire face' kisses, the permanent flaccid penis during sex scenes, dildo plastic cocks (aka Slyus style) the orange semen...it's dull.

Edited at 2017/02/09 20:41:44
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 20:52:43 No.1218680
Add Tag
>>1218677
both comics suck, so stop bitching.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 22:55:19 No.1218729
Add Tag
>>1218677
Yes, I applied myself so I could be told something I already knew from someone who I find has obnoxiously trash opinions,
>the unnecessary camera angles showing the weirdest cliche scene intros
You see I read that I just wanna tell you to go fuck yourself because I think you're full of shit. But no, what a great conversation we're having. (That last bit was sarcasm by the way.)

The only other thing I'm gonna say in defense of this whatever-tier comic, as this guy best puts it >>1218680 I think the elephant's dick is supposed to be hard on page seven in the middle and right panel. For as much as I just praised this guy for his panel construction, I not sure what the hell is going on there with the order. It looks like it's supposed to be read top left to bottom right back to left, maybe middle after left and right, hell if I know.

Fuck both comics, fuck you, and Robin Wright is kind of okay, maybe, whatever, who cares.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/09 23:02:00 No.1218731
Add Tag
File: placticcocksyousay_u18chan.png - (101.67kb, 205x288, plactic cocks you say.png)
>>1218729
Forgot my image. For something that's in a building with lights don't work that's one shiny cock.

You know I can really feel the "passion" of that comic when I look into those delicious dark teal veins.
>>
Asmail Rutherford 2017/02/10 01:19:56 No.1218773
Add Tag
>>1218659
You know... sometimes it's bit hard to identify things such as sarcasm in a written conversation between anonymous people on internet. Just saying.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/18 17:28:30 No.1223891
Add Tag
File: response_u18chan.jpg - (39.2kb, 308x287, response.JPG)
I have to say that that's probably the most realistic response to sex in a furry comic that I've seen in a long time.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/18 22:42:06 No.1223969
Add Tag
Western furry comics are always so fantastical and silly.
>>
Asmail Rutherford 2017/02/20 01:56:20 No.1224290
Add Tag
>>1223969
Which never ever in the history happened with eastern ones, gotcha. Though I'm not exactly sure if you're talking about adult western furry comics or overall, or how can one so simply generalize anything. But hey, everything is possible on internet.
>>
Furrynomous 2017/02/21 15:27:33 No.1225173
Add Tag
File: Ilgrandecioccolatoitaliano_u18chan.png - (106.08kb, 198x324, Il grande cioccolato italiano.png)
>Svizzero? No, Novi

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.28 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.