|
the fact that people are unironically talking about anatomical accuracy in a division of art that renders animal-human hybrids having sex, is a bit comedic.
Guys, over exaggerated anatomy is representational. There's no such thing as "anatomically accurate furry" characters unless you want to try to squeeze fictional representations of human sexuality into the realm of objective anatomy. MORPHING animal and human elements, is what furry art is. Exaggerating certain elements is not new to any realm of creative work. If you got back to the oldest art that exists its literally just headless womans bodies with giant tits and hips. representing fertility, the characteristics males would be seeking.
Massively exaggerated muscles, sexual organs and ejaculate. That's male-centric porn. If you want slim builds, arron isn't for you. He clearly likes the tall vs short, large vs small, gay dynamic. There's nothing missing, its just not for you. You guys remind me of the feminists who cry like banshees everytime they walk past a magazine rack or victorias secrets XD
It might as well be a less violent sub-branch of dominance vs submission. The muscular male being dominated by a much more muscular male, its just domination play. Might as well go to some twink sites and cry because they're not harry lol
Edited at 2021/11/14 13:19:08
|
