Advertisement
Advertisement
/gc/ - Gay Furry Comics
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File 1
Tags 1
Password (for post and file deletion)
Extra [ Is Spoiler ]
  • Supported file types are: jpg,jpeg,png,gif
  • Maximum file size allowed is 20mb.
File: AVirginsRealDreampg01_0_u18chan.jpg - (7.32mb, 3880x4400, A Virgin's Real Dream pg01.jpg) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
SFM short gay comic Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:03:50 No.1530156   
Add Tag
Here is a proper thread for SFM short gay comics, just feel free to post any SFM gay comics of 2 to 4 pages in this thread.
I re-post this thread to exchange place my 1st creations. No need to say: texts is unreadable, I already know that, but I don't have the mood to edit it; pose seems repetitive, I already know this, but hey for simulating motion, it's enough. One last thing: don't say "I don't know what I'm doing with SFM", it is a software in which you do what you like and what you want for photo/video, if you say so, this means that you don't use/know SFM and base your appointment of youtube SFM. If you want to make real critics, be sure to avoid any insults and free vulgarity.
Expand All Images
>>
SFM short gay comic Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:03:54 No.1530157
Add Tag
File: AVirginsRealDreampg02_0_u18chan.jpg - (7.56mb, 3880x4400, A Virgin's Real Dream pg02.jpg)
>>1530156
>>
SFM short gay comic Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:03:57 No.1530158
Add Tag
File: AVirginsRealDreampg03_0_u18chan.jpg - (8.03mb, 3880x4400, A Virgin's Real Dream pg03.jpg)
>>1530156
>>
SFM short gay comic Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:03:59 No.1530159
Add Tag
File: AVirginsRealDreampg04_0_u18chan.jpg - (8.1mb, 3880x4400, A Virgin's Real Dream pg04.jpg)
>>1530156
>>
Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:12:08 No.1530164
Add Tag
File: SevereConsequencespg01_0_u18chan.jpg - (6.68mb, 3880x4400, Severe Consequences pg01.jpg)
WARNING: FETISHIMS AHEAD: GENITAL BITING

You are warned
>>
Rafe93 2018/12/22 02:12:10 No.1530165
Add Tag
File: SevereConsequencespg02_0_u18chan.jpg - (6.85mb, 3880x4400, Severe Consequences pg02.jpg)
>>1530164
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/22 11:17:05 No.1530251
Add Tag
No one else is going to post because SFM is terrible.

Also you already had a thread. Did you really need to start a new one?
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/22 14:25:09 No.1530275
Add Tag
"I didn't like that people were criticizing me, so I made a new thread"

"I know the text is bad, but I don't care"

"I know I reused frames to avoid as much work as possible, but I don't care"

"If you judge my SFM work you obviously don't know anything about SFM and your opinion will be discarded."

You will never improve or make anything that is actually good if you don't care about the quality of your work and ignore all criticism.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/22 15:53:05 No.1530285
Add Tag
>>1530275

"I didn't like that people were criticizing me, so I made a new thread"

"I know the text is bad, but I don't care"

"I know I reused frames to avoid as much work as possible, but I don't care"

"If you judge my SFM work you obviously don't know anything about SFM and your opinion will be discarded."

You will never improve or make anything that is actually good if you don't care about the quality of your work and ignore all criticism.



You can't have it both ways. Are you ignoring criticism or accepting it?

Edited at 2018/12/22 16:10:51
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/22 18:09:39 No.1530301
Add Tag
>>1530285
the one you're responding to is not the author, it is someone pointing out the idiocy of making an entirely new thread for the same shit comics that the author is trying to push despite recieving prior critique.
>>
Rafe93 2018/12/23 01:48:20 No.1530385
Add Tag
>>1530251

I've accidently delete the previous post, so this is why I've maded a new 1, I didn't meant to entirely erase the original 1

>>1530275

Most of this is not entirely true, let me explain:
A: They've turned the discussion violently with direct insults and vugarity but I didn't meant to erase the previous post.
B: I didn't say the texts was bad but if it was "unreadable", and I do care if people complain about the texts.
C: It is not just to avoid more works, but to saves some times, and also some artist does not makes more panels to simulate motion in their comics
D: I've never said "if you judge my SFM works, you don't know what is SFM", it was "What I'm doing with SFM", not my work but the sofware itself, 1 response was this "so you've just used pre-made maps and models and put them together to make this" which is basicly what SFM is.

>>1530285
>>1530301

Real problem with the previous post response were they've violently turn into free insults and bad vulgarity, but I didn't meant to ignore there critics, but being vulgar does not help if you want to critics people's works, I can take critics, but as longs as they don't turn into direct vulgarity, I don't have problems with critics, but this was what happenned in the previous post, which I've accidently delete it entire. I do care about critics, buts only if they don't have free vulgarity, otherwise, I can just take it so bad that I don't take it in truth. Just, be sure to make appointment without bad vulgarity.
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/23 02:06:02 No.1530387
Add Tag
>>1530385
*spanks your ass hard*
>>
Furrynomous 2018/12/23 23:28:04 No.1530657
Add Tag
I have to say that I pretty much knew exactly what I was gonna see when I clicked on this thread, it's pretty average quality in terms of first time SFM creations. Not that anyone should expect Disney quality CG work, but the usual issues are present.

For one, there are no shadows whatsoever. It's painfully flat and somewhat hard to look at due to the lack of depth. If you're using a laptop, I can understand doing minimal light work, but it needs something. Anything. YouTube has countless tutorials on good lighting in SFM, and I highly recommend seeking some of them out. The lights that a map provides can be decent, but building the scene from the ground up, and lighting it by hand produces such higher quality, it shows instantly. And even if it isn't great, practice makes perfect.

Then there's the posing. Again, pretty average. Stilted and tense, looks robotic and unnatural. Especially the first panel of the third image. Then there's the lizards tail throughout 90% of the third page, and the entirety of the fourth. Why is it just sticking out like that? I get it was used for the closeup in the seventh panel, but it's seriously distracting and out of place for the rest of the page.

Finger posing is also pretty minimal. There's more of it than most first timers, and nobody expects Disney levels of meticulousness, but there could be more done to it. Especially in the second collection you posted, it's pretty much nonexistent

Expressions are fine. They're there, which is more than I can say for a lot of first time SFM works.

Camera positioning is basic and static, never really moves unless the characters completely change position, but it's shows what needs to be showed.


I still say the biggest critique would be the lack of any shadows. SFM is a really simple tool, but that simplicity has some serious power. That's why it has the community it does. You can find some seriously creative pieces with SFM due to those limitations and quirks. The more you use it, the better you'll become. Just like with anything, really.

Personally, I would recommend staying away from comics with SFM until you really start to get familiar with the program. Stick to singular images or short image series. It's less work so you can spend more time experimenting with things like lights, poses and all that jazz. Plus it's less work editing them into a comic, which in my opinion always looks odd when done with 3D software, save for stylized, and when visually distinct techniques are used.

But yeah, keep working at it, practice more, and listen to criticism.

[ File Only] Password


Contact us by by phone toll-free! 1-844-FOX-BUTT (369-2888)

Page generated in 0.24 seconds
U18-Chan

All content posted is responsibility of its respective poster and neither the site nor its staff shall be held responsible or liable in any way shape or form.
Please be aware that this kind of fetish artwork is NOT copyrightable in the hosting country and there for its copyright may not be upheld.
We are NOT obligated to remove content under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.