Personal opinion on all the comments:
'Is it art?' This is defined by the one viewing it as much as by the one creating it. If someone decides something they are looking at isn't art, then it's not. TO THEM.
'That horse hole.' Yeah, people are saying 'it's furry porn, it doesn't need to make sense or look good!' and I'm facepalming. Nothing drawn NEEDS to look good, but it's usually better when it does. Some people like that kind of thing, and some don't. As for me? I looked at it and thought,; Imagine your asshole being so swollen that people could see it not through your underwear, but through the shorts you were wearing.' I feel like it's kinda ridiculous for it to be *that* visible. We all know it's a gay comic; you don't need to hint at the guys asshole while he's still dressed. It's probably gonna be on display quite a bit really soon.
I don't think that first comic was anything other than a statement of they don't like that kind of thing, so they're moving on. And although he didn't really need to make said comic, I don't see anything wrong with him having done so. If he had said, 'Prolapsed Rectum! Oh Boy! Love it!' people would still have had something to say about it, and probably argued that he was wrong, so... maybe just chill about it?
|